I totally agree. Terrorism grew in ferocity under Clintoon. He did nothing but cut defense budgets in favor of idiotic social programs that only poor people could take advantage of.
2007-08-17 05:22:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
In August 1998, President Clinton ordered missile strikes against targets in Afghanistan in an effort to hit Osama bin Laden, who had been linked to the embassy bombings in Africa (and was later connected to the attack on the USS Cole). The missiles reportedly missed bin Laden by a few hours, and Clinton was widely criticized by many who claimed he had ordered the strikes primarily to draw attention away from the Monica Lewinsky scandal. As John F. Harris wrote in The Washington Post:I
n August 1998, when [Clinton] ordered missile strikes in an effort to kill Osama bin Laden, there was widespread speculation — from such people as Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) — that he was acting precipitously to draw attention away from the Monica S. Lewinsky scandal, then at full boil. Some said he was mistaken for personalizing the terrorism struggle so much around bin Laden. And when he ordered the closing of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House after domestic terrorism in Oklahoma City, some Republicans accused him of hysteria.
2007-08-17 12:23:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Global warming ain't cool 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why are Republicans so blind to the fact that all your party does is blame the Democrats and you fall right into formation?
Ronald Reagan grew government by 2/3 in 8 years(with a Republican Congress) while taking more vacation than any President(although W passed him in 2005).
2007-08-17 12:17:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Things aren't always black and white.....anyone who believes any American president would intentionally cause harm to America is a fool.
Why did Bush allow Bin Laden to escape when he had him cornered in Tora Bora?
Things aren't always black and white...
I am an Independant voter, neither a replicrat or a demican, niether conservative or liberal....I call em like I see em.
2007-08-17 12:24:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Truce 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the real question is, why are Americans so blind that they enable their president to destroy any sense of security, other people countries, lives and any semblance of good governance, then VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN. Don't blame your politicians for your quagmire. The reality is the American voter is what is destroying you. You put these incompetent fools in power and expect the world to pick up after your ****. Are you all as dumb as this question?
2007-08-17 12:22:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by . . 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Calm down. Clinton isn't the president any more. Let's worry about the damage and horror the current administration is shoving down our throats. Talk about terrorists.
2007-08-17 12:16:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by katydid 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
You forget who funded/supported bin Laden. And Iraq. And Iran.
Go back and read your 1980's history.
He was a good actor.
2007-08-17 13:16:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are you talking about? Clinton has not been President for a long time. This is nothing but divisive drivel. Grow up.
2007-08-17 12:24:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by slykitty62 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets see. You're not referencing any specific bill (they all have numbers) and you are expecting us to trust your interpretation of the bill you haven't referenced.
If you're going to repeat what you hear on the radio you might want to jot down some more details, assuming that the radio host is bothering to give them.
2007-08-17 12:20:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too bad there will always be a small number of Americans who believe that peace is the answer to dealing with the terror threat we ALL face. President Bush is doing what needs to be done to eliminate them. They want to destroy all of us and the stupid democrats think our President is a terrorist...hello???
2007-08-17 12:22:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eric 2
·
0⤊
2⤋