2007-08-17 03:40:50 · 13 answers · asked by kaybaby200688 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I'm surprise they haven't taken them away from her yet. I feel she doesn't deserve them, neither does the father. She has money so that is why they haven't taken them away from her, because I'm sure if she was a regular person who couldn't pay her way through, those kids wouldn't be in her possession anymore.
2007-08-17 03:51:56 · answer #1 · answered by Laura B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is very difficult for a mother to lose her children. Kfed needs to prove that Britney has endangered the welfare of the children. I don't know if he can do that. Britney may be a hot mess but she hasn't done anything to "endanger" the childrens' lives. I think she will keep the kids, although I don't know if that is in their best interest. Britney is mentally ill, in my opinion, and until she seeks treatment she will continue to spiral downward.
2007-08-17 05:00:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Kevin Federline would be the worst parent for the children if they were to give them to him. Before the lawsuit, he was not involved in taking care of the children. I think he is trying to get more money so he never has to work another day. Isn't that why he married Britney in the first place?
2007-08-17 03:51:59 · answer #3 · answered by --- orange --- 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I kind of want Britney to have them.She's okay now.like shes now creating perfume and what has K-Fed done lately. Besides if she loses her kids I think she would be really upset .K -Fed is like getting allowance from Britney.HE gets US$300,000 a year.And 50% of the Malibu home. His singing is terrible and he USED to be a backup dancer. Britney also tried to get a movie part but didn't.She also hired somebody to help her take care of her kids but shes taking care of them sometimes too.
ALso K-Fed married her just becasue of her money.He used to be with Shar Jackson which has two kids with her.And when she was on his second child.He was with Britney.K-Fed has no control. Also doesn't take any responsibility with Shar Jacksons kids
2007-08-17 04:02:02 · answer #4 · answered by Feefifofum 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Although sometimes taking the kids away from the parents can do more harm to them then help, in this case it would be better for the kids to be taken away. Both of them are unfit to have kids and care more about themselves then they ever could about the kids
2007-08-17 04:29:55 · answer #5 · answered by ambrosia12275 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she prob will
kevins working on getting full custody of the kids
cause brit would like feed the kids soda and doritos
and she would like take them on drives so that they would fall asleep
she is not the rite mother 4 them
but kevin looks like a gangsters
those kids do not hav the rite parents
2007-08-17 06:14:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! She is such a bad parent. Ok, she left them in the deep pool all alone, she put them in the car seat he wrong way, she let made them get her cigarettes for her! She is a horrible mother and i think that they should get taken away from her!!
2007-08-17 03:51:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would follow in the sequence. First she lost her mind, then her hair. Children is bound to follow somewhere.
2007-08-17 03:48:01 · answer #8 · answered by wlucynsky 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think her Mom should take them. She and Kevin neither one deserve them. Maybe it will knock some sense into her.
2007-08-17 03:52:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
WHO CARES?
If she does, it's probably her own fault and she should have thought of that sooner
If she doesn't, shes lucky, but whatever.
2007-08-17 03:48:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋