flip flop - oops
2007-08-17 02:19:26 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I guess he wasn't bribed enough to go on war at that time.
And he wasn't even with Halliburton then. Hence, he didnt wanna invade Iraq at that time.
He's a JOKE of a V-P. He's more like his company Halliburton's PRO, i.e., PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER.
BTW, get ready for some cool swears by the D*ckhead wankers.
2007-08-17 02:49:49 · answer #1 · answered by The ROCK 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Are all Republicans Dick Cheney? No you fool they at the instant are not. Dick Cheney could have a short term memory subject (it particularly is that in case you're stupid adequate to contemplate 10 years short term) yet maximum folk of the the remainder of the rustic replaced into against invading Iraq (Republicans blanketed) in 2003. The conflict purely had a 30ish p.c. approval score. study some thing earlier speaking out of your butt.
2016-10-15 22:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by dunston 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. I've seen it several times on YouTube in the past few days, because many people have linked it to their questions.
All I can say, as a non-Republican and average American is, people do have the option of changing their minds about issues. Times change.
And while I personally don't agree with us having gone back to Iraq... we're there now. It has become a truly difficult situation. And I hope we can somehow send our soldiers home soon.
2007-08-17 03:55:58 · answer #3 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's amazing reading some of the answers to your question. How can it be possible that there are still folks out there trying to connect Iraq to 9-11? It's absolutely mind boggling. There has never been nor will there ever be a shred of evidence that Saddam had any connection to 9-11. Yet the war mongers persist in trying to justify the insane occupation of Iraq as retribution for 9-11. Utterly astounding.
2007-08-17 02:40:21 · answer #4 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Hmm, did they also show the late '90s clips of Hillary, Kerry, Biden, et al, stating that Hussein posed an imminent threat to the US?
2007-08-17 02:35:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
He was against an Iraq invasion before he was for it.
Bizzaro Kerry.
Flop-flipper.
Grumpy sissy.
A real dick.
2007-08-17 02:44:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Cheney was referring to a US response to the Kuwaiti situation.
2007-08-17 02:26:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
They were just towing the line at the time which was politically in line. Same now. They are in bed with the oil industry and want to privatize Iraq's oil fields. Hypocrisy is the first tenet of CON-servativism.
2007-08-17 02:38:34 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I saw it here on Y!A first (think Rove posted it) - then on the Daily Show.
Funny how many waffles this administration produces. I hear Bush & Cheney are going to start a Waffle House franchise after they are done disenfranchising the American middle class.
2007-08-17 02:31:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
This is 2007. That's 1994.
Thirteen year difference.
So your point is what?
2007-08-17 02:26:26 · answer #10 · answered by Frank Dileo 3 · 8⤊ 1⤋