please dont say england or india coz we all know they not going to
2007-08-17 01:25:03 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Australia.
2007-08-17 01:28:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well u cant say that it will not be India or England.Twenty20 is a very short version of the game.So upsets are possible.No team is favorites.And never underestimate India.They have some of best strikers in the world like Dhoni,Yuvraj etc.India won the 1983 world cup when no one expected them to.They won 1986 world series,2002 ICC champions trophy too.Also they finished 2nd in 2003 world cup and 2000 ICC champions trophy.Just one bad world cup in 2007 cant rule them out.And for your information India is the only nation in the world to have 100% record in 20-20 till now.Thus no country can be ruled out and anything is possible.
2007-08-17 23:14:30 · answer #2 · answered by Debjit L 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok then - New Zealand as nobody else has gone for them. But does any serious cricket fan give a toss? It's just a money making exercise and has nothing to do with the sport of cricket. A bastardized version of Pyjamarama? Laughable! Stuff to get Yankee money, women and children involved in the game. All British sport should have a draw as an option.
2007-08-19 12:32:18 · answer #3 · answered by mustardcharlie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India or England
For the Lastest Details of Twenty20 World just on http://twenty20world.blogspot.com
Email Subcbrition: -
http://feeds.feedburner.com/twenty20
2007-08-18 01:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by BInterest 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So why must we not say England or India? Cuz they are weak in limited over fixtures? If u didnt know, 20-20 games are sometimes based on luck. Players just swing and hit, ANYONE CAN WIN IT!
I can tell u this, Australia will be stopped, and England or South Africa WILL win it, u remember this answer.
2007-08-17 01:34:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
South Africa
2007-08-17 11:23:22 · answer #6 · answered by shahroz 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Australia not good in 22-20 matches.England best than them in 20-20 Best chances i think Sri lanka, New zealand, India South africa and England.
2007-08-19 20:07:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously Australia..
I can't for the life of me understand why England have picked some of these so called 'specialist' players - The only reason most England internationals don't have much experience playing domestic twenty20 is because they've been playing for their country.... It isn't because they're worse players than the likes of Snape, and Schofield (!!!)
2007-08-17 01:43:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
India - 90%
Australia - 85%
Newzealand - 82%
South Africa - 78%
Pakistan - 75%
Sri Lanka - 72%
England - 68%
West Indies - 65%
Bangladesh - 25%
2007-08-19 17:23:59 · answer #9 · answered by Thamara 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India
2007-08-17 06:06:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who would bet against Australia , they always display the right attitude on and off the field . Not to mention the number of very talented players and as it is a batsman's game (20/20) they have more fire power
But hopefully Englands so called specialist players can demonstrate the right skills to pull of a shock
2007-08-17 04:24:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋