The McCann's have shown themselves to be unstructured oddities. Some of things they have done (and not done) since their little girl went missing, are hardly feasible. Gerry took on the "role" of "ambassador" with panache..........even looking as if he had forgotten why he was there in the first place. I could be wrong, but sometimes he looks gleeful at the future earnings these roles will give him!? How sick is that?
If this couple are to redeem themselves in any way, they will take a step back and look at some of their behaviour. This is what has turned a lot of the public against them, and yet they carry on with fervour.
The lies the told at the beginning will always follow them. Even yet they are sticking to "we checked the children etc" when they know the truth is very different. There are those who can vouch for them not having left the table. Gerry lied further when he later said "we all checked the children etc" This too has infuriated people.
By "all" he meant the other couples (friends) who were dining with them. But surely if there had been a grain of truth in this, rightly so, these people would be obvious suspects?
The wall of silence coming from them, is deafening! This is most likely because like Kate & Gerry they too left their children unattended that night, and like the McCann's all the previous nights of the holiday.
The whole thing stinks and who knows what became of this little girl and will we ever know?
2007-08-17 00:38:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kate K 1
·
8⤊
2⤋
This blog, as far as I can remember, has always been filled with inconsequential rubbish about his normal day to day routines. He never mentions the search, never says he misses her, never even says I hope we find her.He is a poor excuse for a father.
2007-08-17 05:33:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Gerry's blog is not worth reading. Don't waste your
eyesight on it. Who cares how many miles he jogs
each day, or what brand of sandals he wears.
He's obviously not searching for Madeleine.
I agree with Van der Elst in this matter.
2007-08-17 01:26:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
His blog is shameful. He's never spoken of anything much connected to Madeleine. I read somewhere else, that, his blog is supposedly written in code!
2007-08-17 09:07:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ysanne 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have a strange feeling that Madeleine is probably dead since day one of this whole saga, Hopefully the police are looking at, "HOW", "WHY" and "WHO" cos at this stage I think that is what is importing now.
2007-08-17 03:43:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Have you not also notice at around the 100 day mark when all the stories were being leaked about her being dead etc the tone of the blog changed distinctivly but now it is back to his usual drivel, picking friends up from airports, checking Emails etc....
2007-08-17 00:44:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Dave the guy nees a good ***** slap back into the the world a nut !
2007-08-17 03:21:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, he's famous and rich now, so I guess she's served her purpose.
Or he thinks that people are more interested in how he's coping than in the poor child.
If I didn't know where my child was, I wouldn't be thinking of anything else.
2007-08-17 01:27:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sally 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
His blog is ridiculous
it has contained approximately 4 lines about Madeline ever!
I quite frankly couldn't give f**k what they are up to if it does not involve their missing child and maybe if that is all he has to write about, it really is about time they returned home.
edit
Faith I'm not expecting him to speak about the investigation but he could talk about his daughter - after all if it wasn't for her disappearance he wouldn't even have a website, a blog or a bloody fund.
2007-08-17 00:14:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
16⤊
3⤋
Perhaps he only wants to to look in the countries he likes...or that they have got good media coverage -as he is now famous.........
I'm sure he hasn't looked in Mongolia yet?
2007-08-17 00:27:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by -Tatiana- 2
·
4⤊
1⤋