bishan sardar pape pagadi bedi is a good left arm spinner who is better than titmus.but he is a fudhi maro pape.
2007-08-17 08:30:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Fred Titmus every time. Anyone who says Bedi is biased.
Titmus played first-class cricket for 33 years, his last match coming at the age of 49, after Bedi had already retired. He was a test player for 19 years, although competition for the off-spinner role meant he only played 53 tests in that time. Also, he played the majority of his tests in England, not on helpful Indian wickets. Bedi may have taken more test wickets, but he played more tests and he had a long unbroken run in the team, unlike Titmus.
Another thing that made Titmus the better player was his batting; a test average of over 22 makes him a genuine all-rounder, compared to Bedi's weak average of under 9. Titmus also scored 6 first-class hundreds and 105 first-class fifties.
Lastly, one should remember that Titmus lost 4 toes in a boating accident in 1968 and still came back as a test player six years later at the age of 42.
2007-08-16 22:37:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by piggingheck 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bishan Singh Bedi.
2007-08-16 18:57:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sarang 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bishen Singh Bedi
2007-08-18 08:47:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bishen Singh Bedi is undoubtedly betterof the two , though he could have been more better but for his ego
2007-08-16 19:06:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♫♥♪siddharth ♫♥♪ 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Titmus was an average spinner, Bedi was much better than average.
2007-08-16 21:30:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
choose for on ur very own if u can Bedi replaced right into a left arm spinner from India and Murali is a top arm off-spinner from Lanka- little doubt the two one in each and every of them are from the subcontinent whose pitches have a organic tendency to tutor and organic inclination of the batsman is to bat against spin. Murali had to bowl against Indian batsmen like Sachin, Azhar, Sehwag, Ganguly, Sidhu. Bedi did not would desire to bowl against them or perhaps to Gavaskar or Vishwanath different than in family contributors fits. for the time of Bedi's days Lanka replaced into not taking part in assessments. Bedi replaced right into a member of India's spin quartet with different contributors being Erapalli Prasanna, Venkatraghavan and Bhagwat Chandrashekhar who have been additionally the two proficient and those 4 used to proportion the wickets, additionally compete with one yet another and likewise launch the tension on one yet another. Murali had no quartet or maybe a duet to spin the opponent group. He had the organization of the %. of Vaas. the sole spinner skill he's likewise under tension and he additionally has the possibility of having maximum wickets on turner tracks. Pitches for the time of Bedi's days apart from those in subcontinent have been bouncy or swinging tracks. rapid bowlers for the time of those days have been extra fiery than at present's-there replaced into no limit on bouncers to be bowled in an over and no protecting measures like helmet. A tail ender like Chandrashekhar or Bedi continually had achievable of having retired harm on an identical time as batting against the %. of bowlers like Roberts and keeping or Imran and to that end transforming into unavailable for bowling. at present issues are extra secure. Bedi performed much less attempt fits than Murali and Murali additionally performed in odi and 20-20. Bedi's 267 attempt sufferers replaced right into a checklist for the time of his days. The spin quartet had extra India victories on pitches of britain, Australia and West Indies
2016-12-30 16:48:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
bedi
2007-08-17 17:47:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fred Titmus really`~
2007-08-16 23:27:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
B.S.Bedi of course.
He was a better bowler-left arm bowler.
F.Titmus was an off-spinner also good for some runs.
2007-08-16 23:06:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by karikalan 7
·
0⤊
1⤋