http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/742035/2/istockphoto_742035_condemned_shack.jpg
2007-08-16 14:58:34 · 12 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hmmmmm.
Well it sure is good to see that you're "open minded" enough not to ask about Hilary's TWO mansions, or Kerry's mansion, because this, as usual , is clearly just a republican issue. There is NO way that the democrats should be blamed for this kinda stuff... I mean just because they live in mansions, and fly Lear jets about certainly doesn't take away from the fact that they are all about the poor shleb who lives in that old shack right?
I'm sorry to say that you are an idiot if you think that the blame for poverty in our country rests squarely on George Bush's shoulders. Especially as unemployment has gone to a record low under his administration. You liberal moonbats need to take a break from pointing fingers and decide wether you want to be a part of a democracy that believes in capitalism, or if you want to go find an island somewhere where you can all live like communists and sing Kumbaya around a campfire while sucking on a bong. If you decide to stay, get used to the classes, they exist BECAUSE of capitalism, NOT because of the Republicans. If they DID exist because of the republicans Obama would be living in a trailer down by the river. But don't expect to turn THIS country into another Soviet Union without a fight.
Look at the big picture before you ask stupid questions like that, Bonehead.
2007-08-16 16:54:09 · answer #1 · answered by Tim F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of houses do Hillary's friends live in?
How about the friends of Barack Obama? Or Ted Kennedy?
You think those folks live in modest little tract houses that might as well have been built by Habitat for Humanity?? Al Gore's electric bill alone runs into thousands of dollars a month.
There are always going to be rich people and poor people. One's political affiliation has little to do with that. Its kind of insulting to promote the idea that people that you disagree with politically are somehow evil or less human.
2007-08-16 15:06:19 · answer #2 · answered by chocolahoma 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It's very rare that anyone but someone who is educated and well-off will run for president--especially nowadays, when it costs so much to run! But the entire time someone is running for president, he's also not working at his/her day job. Even MIDDLE class people can't tend to take months off at a time.
And rich people tend to be friends with rich people.
2007-08-16 15:05:49 · answer #3 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because while some choose to use drugs, collect welfare, have illegitimate kids, and not work for a living, others choose to obtain an education, apply themselves and make their own future, without living off the government teat....
2007-08-16 15:07:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Isn't that Beverly Hills, Arkansas?
2007-08-16 15:03:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you actually going to tell us the dems don't live in mansions and compounds. Boy,are you gullible.
2007-08-16 15:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by Got a light Leo? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most people do not live like that. Although, sadly, some do.
2007-08-16 15:05:14 · answer #7 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually,Bush's ranch is more eco-friendly then Gore's huge mansion.
2007-08-16 15:09:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who do they think they are?...Succeeding in the free market while the lazy people are stuck in crappy houses. Damn capitalists.
2007-08-16 15:08:04 · answer #9 · answered by Dude #2369™ 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
ummmm...because they are lazy pigs that haven't been able to dig up a gallon of paint or a hammer in 50 years.
2007-08-16 15:06:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋