MY NEW SCIENCE THEORYy?

Question

well we all know that the more the mass the more the gravity right?

and we all know that einsteins theory or relativity states that there is this thing called matterenergy and when objects mass's decrease, the energy increases. so then if that happens then that would mean that if an object has more mass, it has less energy. and it has to make up for that (because everything in nature tries to be equal) and so it makes up for that by pulling in the energy from other matter, which also makes the objects mass bigger thus increasing the gravity.

this works out cause everything in nature tries to equal out, like osmosis.

what do you think?

nd btw. legally you cannot steal this idea, so dont even try unless you want to face some jailtime or a lawsuit

Answer 1

You misstated your premeses.

E=MC^2 does not mean that when an object's mass decreases that the energy increases. It says that when an object's mass decreases - the decrease is accounted for by other energy with an energy equal to the decreased mass times the speed of light squared. Similarly - it does not mean that if an object has more mass that it has less energy. It means that if its mass increases - then it did that by absorbing energy in an equivalent amount according to the E=MC^2 relationship.

So, things will radiate energy or absorb energy to become more stable - increase entropy. For example, unstable elements at the higher end of the binding energy per nucleon scale will tend to become lead or some other middling/stable element. Stars will be absorbed by black holes, clusters of galaxies will coalesce into super galaxies. The sun will burn out its fuel eventually. It is all hopeless and bleak in the future.

In any case, entropy always being positive will have more effect on what happens than the "osmosis" of E=MC^2.

Answer 2

The idea of Kinetic Kenergy increases as Mass decreases is expounded by the Prof. Ricardo Carezani's Relativity theory.
It appears to obey the 2nd law of thermodynamics where as Einstein Relativity theory in Constrast does not (in the sense that you get nothing witout paying a price. The price for increased velocity is a mass loss.).

The Carezani Relativity theory is the Inverse of the Einstein relativity Theory which says that mass increase with velocity.
Prof Ricardo Carezani not only proves the precession of mercury's perehelium but also that of the Earth as well with a more accurate description than Einstein's.
Your Science idea is very inovative and is very much apreciated in this sector.

Answer 3

Einstein's relationship only says that energy can be expressed in an equivalent amount of matter and vice versa. There is no implied flow from energy to matter and back hence no tendnecy to "equalize" teh matter and energy.

Further, local gravitational energy is largely in the eye of the beholder. General relativity lets me make a reference frame transformation such that the gravitational energy changes, however the mass present does not. Note I said localized, the gravitational energy appears somewhere else in space time - we have to conserve enrgy after all.

You have inappropriately mixed E=mc^2 with equilibrium. Sadly these are two separate unrelated concepts.

Answer 4

To be brutally honest, your theory has very little value. Unless you can calculate specific predictions, such as the precession rate of a planet, or the time dilation of a spacecraft, or the connection between distance and redshift for a distant galaxy, your ideas are simply speculation without any basis. Nobody will waste their time even looking at it unless you can do some calculations like those and get the right answers.

Answer 5

1) You can't patent physics. It's also difficult to get planets to share energy.

2) Osmosis takes energy - so that's not 'free'

3) Energy, for the sake of discussion, has to be conserved. Kinetic energy is made of 2 components mass and velocity. Velocity is a larger driver since that term is squared. You're only using one component of the equation and claiming to create energy. Energy may not be created. It merely changes forms.

Answer 6

Good try, but it wont work.

Nature doesn't want to be equal, true for the E=MC², but atoms in invidual objects are not equal in mass nor are they equal in energy, im not talking about random atoms here. these non-average atoms are applied to same elements in the paradoic table thus hinting the name average atoms mass xx.xxx.

You're talking about gravitational attraction, gravity want's to dystory anything with matter in the universe, this is how it comes to be.
D
Do you really think, you found out an idea?
I bet Steven Hawkings or someone in higher degree would've found this out if thus, was true.

Answer 7

Your question has many false premises, but I think I get the basic idea of what you are saying. The evidence doesn't support it. I know of lots and lots of experiments that would turn out differently if this were true.

Answer 8

Oop! I just stole your idea!!!