great, but does the math check out?
2007-08-16 16:13:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mercury 2010 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Einstein Relativity theory indicates Mass increase with velocity. Mass increases faster than Energy increases,that means mass is created faster then energy is created according to the theory.
Note my teacher in school said that Energy cannot be created or destroyed.Some how that does not agree with the idea that energy is created because of velocity in Einstein formula of mass increase.(nothing comes from nothing)
You are right about the more the mass the the more Gravity power is required ot hold it togetherr. The Gravity Energy used in the surrounding volume of space does not exceed the Structural energy of the mass structure.
When the Earth Receives mass from Space ,it becomes absorbed as additional structured mass ,causing an increase of radius vector in orbiting the barry center of the Sun.
Note ,mass does not Get Bigger because Relativity theory says so. Its gets bigger because it is embided from external radiation causing a velocity change ,rather than velocity causing a mass change. Velocity and motion must have a cause.
Ps; it is always appreciated in the scientific community that some one offers an inovative idea on Gravity no matter how far fetched the ideas seems to be; it could be correct.So no one is knocking your idea. To obtain recognition it is sugested you publish it in a scientific journal.
Yahoo answer is copy righted
2007-08-16 14:03:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by goring 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Einstein's theory doesn't just say that mass causes gravity. Energy also does, and so does pressure and certain stresses. So the whole basis for your theory is wrong.
I'll tell you what. Compute the precession of the orbit of Mercury from your theory and if it is correct, you might be able to get someone to listen. Then apply it to gravitational lensing and time dilation. If your predictions agree with experiment, someone will listen enough to at least give a critique. If you can't do any of these, then nobody will bother with your idea. Sorry.
2007-08-16 14:24:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by mathematician 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unless you have a mathematical proof that shows this to be true, it's not valid. Anyway, Einstein said that matter and energy are the same thing, viewed differently. It's not as if mass increases and energy decreases; if one increases, then so does the other.
2007-08-16 14:02:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by clitt1234 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you're trying to say that the more mass you gain, the more energy you get. That's not quite correct - Einstein was saying that mass and energy are interchangable, that mass can be converted to energy, and energy to mass. It doesn't mean more of one, more of the other.
And posting something on an internet forum is certainly NOT considered a copyright. Anyone could have stolen that and published it themselves if it were worth it.
2007-08-16 13:42:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by eri 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
what's general now's that Newton got here close, Einstein got here closer, and the two are classic theories, with stable reasons to think of a extra superb approximation will come from quantization. thinking in terms of top or incorrect, nonetheless, isn't the superb attitude. What concerns is that the regulations extra healthful with different regulations and that they make sturdy approximations for predictive applications. the actuality that we've placed adult adult males on the moon using Newtonian physics shows it is not too undesirable, and Einstein's equation has effectively envisioned issues like gravitational lensing. That makes them enormously darned useful.
2016-10-02 11:52:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i see no reason why we cant steal this idea. u havent copyrighted it or anything.
anyways, if less mass = more energy, then what u said in the second part, it getting more energy from other matter (which idk if it could do) would cause it to get less massive not more massive. which would decrese the gravity. but anyways, idk if it works like that...
2007-08-16 13:44:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL you shouldn't have any problem getting a patent on your idea. I seriously doubt if anyone else would want to claim that it was theirs. Good luck.
2007-08-16 13:45:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Troasa 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Give him a break. The only really silly thing he said was about stealing his idea.
2007-08-16 14:05:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by nick s 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, but you might sell it to a publisher of comic books.
2007-08-16 13:45:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Irv S 7
·
4⤊
0⤋