English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know I said I'd vote for her if she ever ran. She kept insisting she wasn't running then out of the blue decided to run, and for what reason? She says she can do better than the Bush Administration. That's all she keeps saying but hasn't come out with anything concrete yet. So, right there tells me she isn't to be trusted. And I'm not even a liberal or conservative. I think she's a liar.

2007-08-16 12:28:37 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

24 answers

ha-ha very funny
what Politicians say "concrete" things you can count on ?

I'm voting for Hillary because I trust the others Less.

2007-08-16 12:35:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

I most likely wouldn't vote for her. If my only choices were Hillary and that slimy, gutless, fear-mongering turd Giuliani, then I'd have to vote for her. But otherwise she's not a candidate I'm fond of. Most of the Democratic candidates suck. And ALL of the Republican candidates suck. We've got very little choice (as usual). If I had to vote tomorrow I'd choose Gravel, Kucinich, or Paul (yes, I know he's running on a Republican ticket...but he's not a Repub., he's a Libertarian).

2007-08-16 19:45:00 · answer #2 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 2 2

I think most people have a "clencher" issue which they always vote for. (Example: LGBT usually vote for democrats, staunch pro-lifers usually vote republican). I'm not a democrat and don't agree with the entire democratic ticket but I'll likely vote for the Democrat Presidential nominee in 2008 due to their stance on gay rights, military spending and war in general.

2007-08-16 19:43:29 · answer #3 · answered by collegedebt 3 · 2 1

That's what every politician says before they announce. Otherwise, they are open to charges that they aren't serving their current constituants interests. I plan on voting for her because in general i agree with the positions she holds on most subjects.

2007-08-16 19:35:55 · answer #4 · answered by Chance20_m 5 · 3 3

I think you are right . She has and will lie. The trouble is that most all of the candidates have and will lie . So who do we trust ? I think we have to pick the most qualified liar and live with the consequences.

2007-08-16 19:34:44 · answer #5 · answered by Mildred S 6 · 9 1

You just figured out the big plan of the Liberal Democrats ! First, Tell every one we can do a better job then republicans #2 blame every thing that goes wrong on republicans! OK ,OK so what is the big plan???? ummmm That is the big plan!!!

2007-08-16 19:47:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

She is experienced, so I think we will have to wait till 2009 and see, and if she doesn't do the things she is promising then she will not be re elected in 2012.

2007-08-16 19:43:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

No, and not because she's a woman or Bill's wife. I was much more in agreement with his view of the world than hers.

2007-08-16 19:35:02 · answer #8 · answered by Buy Sam a Drink 5 · 4 2

I'd rather poke my eyes out with rusty forks than to vote for her.

If no one suitable ran against her, I'd write in Heidi Flice before I'd ever consider it.

2007-08-16 19:42:08 · answer #9 · answered by Karma 4 · 3 4

Well I think she does have quite a bit of experience but I do not think I would vote for her.

2007-08-16 19:36:55 · answer #10 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers