English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

no

2007-08-16 10:49:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

You get into the area of "assumed risk" here. You stand up at the plate with a bat and a guy throwing a small, hard object toward you, there's always a chance that you could be hit. The batter has to accept that possibility as a precondition of the game. Sure, pitchers throw at batters, but as others have said, it's a little hard to prove.

Now ... the Jose Offerman case in minor league baseball is a different story. Apparently Offerman disagreed with that analysis, and tried to hit a home run with the pitcher's head with his bat. If he had connected, I would guess that someone from the legal system would have been contacted.

2007-08-16 18:39:40 · answer #2 · answered by wdx2bb 7 · 0 1

If so, you would not have pitchers admitting to intentional bean balls. I assume you are asking this in repsonse to the guy that charged the mound with a bat. That one is obvious, but in case of pitching at head how can you prove between intentional and accident without a shadow of a doubt. So, if it was considered a crime...see where I am going. I think being internally punishable by MLB is best thing.

2007-08-16 17:52:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If he knowingly did and you have some way to prove it then YES. I heard about a first base coach that died last month from getting hit in the head with a foul ball. I think all the players need to be accountable for their actions.

2007-08-16 18:20:16 · answer #4 · answered by littledel 5 · 0 0

I think so but the biggest problem proving it would be intent. Did he intentionally do it or did it just get away from him?

It's a judgement call by the ump during the game and I'm sure there have been times when a player was tossed unfairly and vice versa.

Intentionally throwing a 90+ mph fastball at someone's head could kill them.

2007-08-16 17:51:47 · answer #5 · answered by reed7403 4 · 2 0

it technically is

Attempted Aggravated Battery with a Weapon(the ball)

If the batter is hit....
Aggravated Battery with a Weapon

It would be nearly impossible to prove that the pitcher intentionally threw the ball at the batter without a confession

2007-08-16 17:55:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. A baseball thrown at 90-plus MPH at a players head can kill the batter, even with a helmet on. That should be concidered attempted murder. That is no exadgeration!

2007-08-16 17:53:19 · answer #7 · answered by baseballer 1 · 0 0

Absolutely not. That's a risk the batter takes by stepping into the box. NFL and NHL players take the same risks every game. Guys get hurt, it's part of the game.

2007-08-16 18:33:35 · answer #8 · answered by Jeff 2 · 0 1

yes it should be considered a crime, though it may be extremely hard to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the throw was intentionally aimed at the head.

2007-08-16 17:50:18 · answer #9 · answered by purplepurplesage 1 · 1 0

Unfortunately in day and age there's excuse for everything. It would determine on several factors, none of which could be based on anything other than character and past experiences.

2007-08-16 17:56:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

umm no some pitchers will do that if the batter is really good and they don't want any runs in. so no i mean there wearing a helmet they'll be fine wen they get hit . I'm a pitcher and i've intentually hit people before. they were fine. so its all part of the game.
-Amn

2007-08-16 17:51:57 · answer #11 · answered by auttiemarie03 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers