no
2007-08-16 10:49:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You get into the area of "assumed risk" here. You stand up at the plate with a bat and a guy throwing a small, hard object toward you, there's always a chance that you could be hit. The batter has to accept that possibility as a precondition of the game. Sure, pitchers throw at batters, but as others have said, it's a little hard to prove.
Now ... the Jose Offerman case in minor league baseball is a different story. Apparently Offerman disagreed with that analysis, and tried to hit a home run with the pitcher's head with his bat. If he had connected, I would guess that someone from the legal system would have been contacted.
2007-08-16 18:39:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by wdx2bb 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
If so, you would not have pitchers admitting to intentional bean balls. I assume you are asking this in repsonse to the guy that charged the mound with a bat. That one is obvious, but in case of pitching at head how can you prove between intentional and accident without a shadow of a doubt. So, if it was considered a crime...see where I am going. I think being internally punishable by MLB is best thing.
2007-08-16 17:52:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If he knowingly did and you have some way to prove it then YES. I heard about a first base coach that died last month from getting hit in the head with a foul ball. I think all the players need to be accountable for their actions.
2007-08-16 18:20:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by littledel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think so but the biggest problem proving it would be intent. Did he intentionally do it or did it just get away from him?
It's a judgement call by the ump during the game and I'm sure there have been times when a player was tossed unfairly and vice versa.
Intentionally throwing a 90+ mph fastball at someone's head could kill them.
2007-08-16 17:51:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by reed7403 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
it technically is
Attempted Aggravated Battery with a Weapon(the ball)
If the batter is hit....
Aggravated Battery with a Weapon
It would be nearly impossible to prove that the pitcher intentionally threw the ball at the batter without a confession
2007-08-16 17:55:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. A baseball thrown at 90-plus MPH at a players head can kill the batter, even with a helmet on. That should be concidered attempted murder. That is no exadgeration!
2007-08-16 17:53:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by baseballer 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. That's a risk the batter takes by stepping into the box. NFL and NHL players take the same risks every game. Guys get hurt, it's part of the game.
2007-08-16 18:33:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jeff 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes it should be considered a crime, though it may be extremely hard to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the throw was intentionally aimed at the head.
2007-08-16 17:50:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by purplepurplesage 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately in day and age there's excuse for everything. It would determine on several factors, none of which could be based on anything other than character and past experiences.
2007-08-16 17:56:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
umm no some pitchers will do that if the batter is really good and they don't want any runs in. so no i mean there wearing a helmet they'll be fine wen they get hit . I'm a pitcher and i've intentually hit people before. they were fine. so its all part of the game.
-Amn
2007-08-16 17:51:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by auttiemarie03 2
·
0⤊
3⤋