English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I believe it's unfair to say TNA uses has beens for ratings, when WWE still uses HBK, HHH, Stone Cold, among other has beens just to keep ratings up. What that tells me is that current young talent can't keep the ratings up, unless Vince shows up, or HHH/HBK/Stone Cold or other past stars show up, is that agreeable?

2007-08-16 08:47:52 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

WOW, one week of ratings your backing your comments on pedigree? Do you realize this is where TNA is gonna be for a while b/c they're still relatively new to the world of businesses, wrestling world, etc. WWE has been around for awhile, and WWE has been in hot water with ratings slipping, if it wasn't for McMahonism, and HHH is RAW, current WWE talent couldn't hold RAW up jack!

2007-08-16 09:38:10 · update #1

7 answers

i think wwe has a lot of young talent that they keep on Heat, instead of developing characters for them. soon HHH, hbk, ect. will be too old to wrestle , and they will be retiring, and wwe will have no one. thats why i like tna more, because they use their young talent like shelley, sabin, sonjay dutt, and others.

2007-08-16 08:59:03 · answer #1 · answered by hail sabin <3. 4 · 0 0

Yeah. It's pretty safe to say it. Imagine a typical Monday Night Raw. Now imagine it without HHH, HBK, Cena, or Flair. What do you get? A bunch of ticked of fans and a really mediocre wrestling show. Enough said...

2007-08-16 15:48:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, because the two main superstars on each brand haven't been i nthe business for years. Cena & Batista are the biggest superstars in the WWE, and only got big in the past 5 years.

2007-08-16 09:03:52 · answer #3 · answered by «G6260» 6 · 0 0

1. all of those wwe stars you just listed are better prformers than 90% of the TNA locker room

2. AM RAW - .89
TNA IMPACT! - .93
RAW- 3.7
need i say more
SHUT UP

2007-08-16 09:15:30 · answer #4 · answered by FEAR THE PEDIGREE 5 · 1 1

HAS BEENS..... PLEASE ELABORATE BECAUSE A HAS BEEN IS A FAT,OUT OF SHAPE, BROKE, OUT ON THE STREETS,TALENTLESS LOSER (WOW I JUST DESCRIBED THE WHOLE TNA ROSTER). IS SHAWN MICHEALS A HAS BEEN? I THINK NOT. TRIPLE H IS STILL IN HIS PRIME. STONE COLD DOES IT CAUSE HE LOVES THIS BUSINESS. HAS BEENS (TEST, ANGEL, STINERS,DUDLEYS, ROAD DOGG AND JESSE JAMES, STING, JEFF JARRET, RAVEN, RHYNO) DO IT FOR THE MONEY. THEY DONT CARE ABOUT THIS BUSINESS.

2007-08-16 14:14:43 · answer #5 · answered by BOB 6 · 0 2

Well the youngsters ain't ready yet

2007-08-16 08:53:31 · answer #6 · answered by Manual 5 · 0 1

the younger talent sucks. all the older talent is better and more entertaining.

2007-08-16 08:58:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers