Non-traditionalist.
But, I have been exposed to many traditional Elders and learned to have quite a respect for the formal training of many.
2007-08-16 07:45:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not sure what you mean by traditionalists, maybe Wiccans? I consider myself an eclectic practitioner of Paganism, although I studied and initiated into two different Wiccan traditions. The difference is that there can be specific myth cycles, deities, and rituals within a tradition, but an "eclectic" learns a lot about many traditions and cultures, and blends many different things together to create a really personally meaningful spiritual experience. I believe my good Wiccan training was a wonderful foundation that enabled me to build a framework within which I could explore for further spiritual meaning. :)
2007-08-16 14:50:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by s1sm00n 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I came to paganism through reading and self-discovery. I practice alone and in concordance with the cycles of the sun, the moon, and the seasons. For me, the entire process has been very personal, so I guess I would call myself a "non-traditionalist."
2007-08-16 15:05:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by votanone_eye 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being born of The Lore doesn't mean you must stay with its studies throughout your life. I made that choice in each step of my studies. I find the usage of traditional in this contemporary time rather twisted away from my usage.
Examples: There are traditional ways is prepare a Herbal drink. There are traditional ways to make and use a dowsing rod.
If your thoughts are of Witchcraft....there was no such thing in the English vocabulary until about 1600. So, I suppose someone could claim a family tradition of Witchcraft that goes back 4 centuries. The Crafts themselves go back to the dawn of humankind.
2007-08-16 15:45:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Terry 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I never know how to answer this. Apparently there's a whole taxonomy out there that I never knew about until after I gave up on the whole pagan thing. Part of being a solitary, I guess. Is there a convenient Ishkur's style guide to Pagan affiliations?
The only view that I really have on this is that people can be really snotty about who is and is not a Wiccan or a Pagan or whatever the hell. I think of it more like the queer community, where self-identification is king. You know?
2007-08-16 14:54:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by pippini 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure how to answer this. My guess is that I would be considered a bit traditional. I follow a Celtic Reconstructionist path.
Can you detail a bit what you mean by Traditional and Non-Traditional?
Edited to add:
You also asked about our views---
I'm a hard polytheist; my deities are mostly Gaulish. I also honor local land and water deities and my ancestors. Giving offerings is a large part of my practice. I believe in reincarnation and the existence of an upper, middle and lower world. I see my deities as a mixture of what we consider positive and negative (rather than exclusively one or the other).
2007-08-16 15:32:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Witchy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i was raised being wiccan...mainly for the reason that my mom and aunt are witches, my aunt being one of the well known witches out there. i wouldnt say that im a traditionalist...i like to incorporate my own beliefs with the ones that i've been taught.
2007-08-16 15:19:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by electragirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whatever any of that stuff is. I'm an energy person, plain and simple. Don't need fancy tites or designations to do what I do.
2007-08-16 15:31:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sal D 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm up there with you...
I was raised in the Black Forest tradition, but found myself to be more of an eclectic in my young adult and adult years.
2007-08-16 14:48:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by ~*Live, Love and Blessed Be*~ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm probably what you would call non-traditional but only because I use modern methods as well as traditional in my craft.
2007-08-20 11:36:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jinxyblue 6
·
0⤊
0⤋