NO-OFFSHORE (USA,CANADA,Europe...) vs OFFSHORE (India,China...)?

Question

Do you have any analyse information about compare expense / time to market, developed by NO-OFFSHORE (USA,CANADA,Europe...) vs OFFSHORE (India,China...) teams.

Answer 1

The Gartner Group probably has what you are looking for. I don't know of a specific study from them but they do a lot of research and analysis that likely covers what you want.

From the Gartner website:

Gartner, Inc. (NYSE: IT) is the world’s leading information technology research and advisory company.

NOTE: Their services are not free. I do not know what they charge so contact them with your specific requirements and they probably have research and analysis they can provide.

Answer 2

Offshore wind is a effective dream, besides the undeniable fact that it shouldn't take place interior the U. S. quickly; there are precisely 0 ships in North u.s. able to erecting any tremendous turbines offshore on the 2nd. With the Thames challenge and different Dutch, German, Danish and chinese language initiatives going there won't going be any ships despatched over from there to here to help out the two. we've to construct our very own if this is going to take place any time quickly. advantageous there are better and steadier winds at sea, yet offshore wind is plenty greater costly to place in than onshore, notably because of the fact we are beginning the academic curve on the very backside. Coal is so perfect as a capability source because of the fact there is comparatively little preliminary capital investment mandatory. no person takes under consideration the gasoline expenses, in simple terms the up front fee in the previous money starts off to come back in. Plus, we nonetheless have the difficulty of electric powered automobiles. "no longer sufficient selection, no longer sufficient capability, look crappy, loss of existence traps, ..." i will purchase one, yet no longer till my truck dies. different than for the $2000+ conversion fee, Pickins plan grew to become into notably reliable.