Do You Think the Republicans Will Steal the 2008 Presidential Election Through Rigged Voting Machines?

Question

You know, like they did with caging lists and dirty tricks in 2000 and 2004?

I see all the Lush Windbag dittoheads are out in force with their pre-chewed talking points ready for regurgitation. Sorry, Sean Insannity zombies, your crimes are in the process of being exposed. We all know who the traitors are, and they all have R's after their name. Have fun losing BIG in '08. How many votes are you willing to fudge?

Answer 1

maybe. They did it twice already.

But another option is martial law. Another 911 could be created by the government and according to a new bill that passed Bush would be essentially a dictator and that would solve all of their problems.

They are already training preachers across the country to teach people to obey their government and accept martial law and to accept their property being taken away and their weapons taken away.

All the signs point to that actually. The government is planning on reinstating the draft and declaring martial law in America.

Sounds fun.

Answer 2

The Republicans did not steal any elections in 2000 and 2004. You need to get over the fact that the Democrats lost fair and square. Personally I hope you keep on believing that the Republicans stole the elections becasue then you will keep asking stupid questions like this instead of focusing on the real reason that the democrats lost which is a lack of real ideas that resonate with the American people.

Answer 3

OHMIGAWD Liberals are already thinking up excuses for losing the next election and it hasn't even started yet. Well what do you expect when you have Hillary as your party front runner and the majority of people in the US don't like her.

When are they going to get a clue it's not the Republican tricks that is costing them elections, it's the candidate they are picking to run? Well that and the bad campaigns.

Well you have a Democrat controlled Congress now. Have you heard any of the leaders talk about making changes in the ways elections are held? In 2000 Al Gore got more popular votes than Bush but he didn't get more Electoral College votes. Do you hear about the Democrats doing anything to change that situation? Al Gore lost his home state to a Republican. Bill Clinton's home state had voted for him by a wide margin twice. The Arkansas legislature is predominantly Democrat. Al lost Arkansas. I don't think it was because Tennessee color is Volunteer orange and Arkansas color is Razorback red.

You talk about caging lists and dirty tricks. Have you heard about how dead people vote Democrat especially in Illinois? Did you hear about how Republican voter vans had their tires slashed the night before elections? Get the weeds out of your garden before you get critical of your neighbors weeds.

Start off with admitting Democrats lost because of their candidates inhaled and there is a chance they might win in 2008. Take the blame and pick better candidates. Better candidates mean more wins.

Answer 4

The general election is 16 months away. If you have a problem sleeping, you need to focus on what is really bothering you. Such as why dead people are allowed to vote for Democrats in the black belt in AL. If this does not bother you, why do you accuse with no proof. If you can not accept defeat, you can volunteer as a poll watcher on election day and then you can see what is really happening. Like the
"Bear" said, "A tie is like kissing your sister." Get involved in the process. Americans do not like to lose. The dems play dirty tricks too.

Answer 5

Typical liberal logic- listen to a lie from another liberal and the lie becomes the truth.

I live in Florida, saw firsthand the democrats try to steal the election for Gore by bringing race baiters to imply machines were rigged (total lie), denied military votes and absentee votes, demanded recounts (which proved Gore lost), etc.

Libs tried to steal the election, could not get away with it, then repeat a lie that they were cheated.

So, no I don't think the republican party would stoop as low as our socialist party.

Answer 6

No. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, etc will help them quite enough. Besides, Dems are the ones that repeatedly attempt to pervert the voting process to change the outcomes of elections. Get a grip.

Answer 7

Yes. As a matter of fact, and don't tell anyone this, but I have secretly been working on the Committee for World Domination since 2004 and we've made sure that we will win again.
And as usual, we're going to do it by rigging the election so close that we spend weeks if not months arguing with democrats about whether or not we won. We are always careful not to rig a landslide or to make it look like we have any sort of mandate. That way our position is weakened throughout our terms.
Seriously.

Answer 8

You are so mis informed...from the last election more democrates were fined and in legal hot water for election tampering then republicans by a far shot...do your research...the Dem's flattened tires broke into offeces voted dead people.....Be honest man.....

Answer 9

Depends on the ration of rigged voting machines to dead Democrats who still manage to vote.

Answer 10

Yep. That 3,000,000 vote victory was "So Close" in 2004.
You guys are already giving up and writing your Conspiracy speeches? Is Hillary that bad that she has NO chance?
Gosh, you folks are sad.
By the way, were the voting machines "Rigged" when the Dems. won back Congress in 2006? Did the Republicans "forget" to Rig them that day?
You guys sure give me a good laugh.

Answer 11

The Democrats did the same in 2006, there's lots of evidence for it. Rush Holt, who won by more than twice his opponent, publicly announced that someone cheated on his behalf against his wishes. The machine counted votes for him twice, but since he won by more than twice; he still won legitimately. Contrary to the conspiracy that Diebolds caters to conservatives only, the fact is they cater to $ and whomever has more of it. Many states have new laws requiring voting machines to have full technical documentation and be open source. Ironically, the voting machines won't be appearing in those states. I'll let you speculate as to why.