http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/chavez-seeks-constitutional-changes-to-perpetuate-power/2007/08/16/1186857683459.html
2007-08-16 04:42:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
This is just want Hillary wants to create. She has said she wants to raise taxes a great deal. This means the government get much bigger and takes more control of the economy. Then the government dictates what its people can do. Makes Hugo and Hillary happy to have this kind of control. Only problem is exports dropped sharply in Venezuela per reuters over the last year. Chavez is rapidly pushing Venezuala toward Cuban style poverty. I feel bad for the poor there as jobs are going away as Socialism takes over. But that is coming to the U.S. as Hillary's big taxes and Socialized medicine will also shut down the US economy and unemployment and suicide rate will double, like France. I feel for the poor here as well, they will pay the most for this.
2007-08-16 04:50:39 · answer #1 · answered by Lighthearted 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, such as buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market do not actually work.
Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Pathological lying about profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the public with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names, fake backgrounds, and fake property).
Actual economics involves the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies owning the companies, and voting at work in order to operate the companies they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents, and false government.
2007-08-17 11:02:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the one who wants to be a dictator. Chavez is nobody's hero.
2007-08-16 11:48:07 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i don't think so, i think USA liberals just ideally want everyone to be free and be happy and not bother anybody, chavez is power hungry
2007-08-16 11:48:22 · answer #4 · answered by secretservice 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Chavez is not a liberal - he is a FASCIST in liberal's clothing.
2007-08-16 11:47:11 · answer #5 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't see what one has to do w/ the other, besides your labeling.
2007-08-16 11:48:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋