English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I see Democrats sometimes talking about freedom but, seriously, do they have any ground to argue that they're the party in favor of freedom?

They also get support from the pot smokers, the homosexuals..... The Democrats will never legalize pot and if they make gay marriage legal it will be through the courts, not the legislature.

2007-08-16 03:30:49 · 13 answers · asked by truthisback 3 in Politics & Government Politics

There's never been a socialist utopia - and since we've cut tax rates there are a lot more millionaires than there used to be.

2007-08-16 03:49:31 · update #1

I don't care if Billy and Bobby get married either - - - but my right to not have to support people I've never met is equally sacrosanct.

You can't have it both ways.

2007-08-16 03:50:31 · update #2

cattledog nobody's "spying on citizens without warrants."

2007-08-16 08:45:21 · update #3

13 answers

To some on the left, confiscating income and failing to monitor enemy communications are both ways to attack and otherwise weaken American society and institutions.

That explains the apparent contradiction.

2007-08-16 03:55:40 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0 1

Losing the freedoms that we already have is wrong. People have fought for these freedoms and now they are being taken away.
You ask if Democrats are the party of freedom and then you gripe about pot smokers, and homosexuals. Smoking pot is illegal, granted, but homosexuality isn't. You can't pick and choose who YOU deem worthy of freedoms. Gays should have the same rights as you and I.

2007-08-16 03:40:23 · answer #2 · answered by katydid 7 · 3 0

The democrats response to what they think of same sex unions:

Richardson: Hahmina Hahmina Hahmina ahhhhhhhh welllllll ahhhhh hamina hamina...

Edwards: “I’m not comfortable around those people.”

H. Clinton: “I prefer to think of it as being very positive about civil unions.”

Obama: “Oh, come on now,”

Kuchich: I am in full support for gay marriage.

Gravel: I am in full support for gay marriage.

Biden: Huh? Wha? Shhhhhhhh

Dodd: Huh? Wha? Shhhhhhhh

B. Clinton: Don't ask don't tell

This is the party that will unite the American people.
Ohhhh brother.

2007-08-16 03:54:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

How do you think you are going to be able to keep what you've earned when this President has taken a government SURPLUS and turned it into a 9 TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT

Are you living in fantasy land
Don't you realize someone will have to pay for this incredible debt this administration has saddled our nation with?

1 trillion for i Iraq war

thats 1 million million dollars !!!

thats 10 million $100,000 houses !!!

then we have the other 8 trillion that God only knows where it went

Your grandchildrens children will curse his name when they hear it

That is if you republicans haven't "morphed" his extreme expendatures into revisionist history and tell them he was a democrat !!

2007-08-16 03:45:10 · answer #4 · answered by Deidre K 3 · 1 0

No, I'm not so greedy and ignorant that I would give up my liberties for a few dollars. I realize that the neocon way is to sell to the highest bidder, but some of us still have principles.

And Dems probably get support from pot smokers and homosexuals because they are not bigots like Republicans, if your statement is representative of the Republican party.

2007-08-16 03:40:55 · answer #5 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 2 1

I think to some, it is more important to have the freedom of spreading misinformation merely to place a political party above the country...
The "win at any cost" mentality seems favored by some who use Free SPeech in unspeakable ways.

2007-08-16 03:40:59 · answer #6 · answered by outcrop 5 · 0 0

I don't see the connection with my finances and bank account with my civil liberties. I value both... I don't want this administration to spy on its citizens without warrants... period.

BTW, I am NOT a Democrat. So my answer might blow your mind that a person who tends to vote Republican does not agree with you or this administration (gasp!). If we should be under martial law then come out and declare it... until then we need to work with the Constition and the laws of this nation.

2007-08-16 03:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by cattledog 7 · 2 0

The democratic party isn't the same party that it was 30- 40 years ago..The gays were in the closet and afraid to come out..The civil rights movement was in its infancy..now the everybody has rights and that is who the democratic party appeals to.

2007-08-16 03:49:37 · answer #8 · answered by John 6 · 1 0

Freedom would not might desire to be risky each and every of the time. we are able to be secure and unfastened. secure practices might desire to be a appropriate precedence. all of us take adverse aspects interior the living house or out. there is threat in each and every thing notably plenty yet some issues are greater volatile than others and to me secure practices is greater important than some events.case in point i does no longer race a automobile or do extensive mountaineering with suggestions and belts. To me this is an pointless threat and that i do no longer locate freedom in those varieties issues.i like to bypass trekking on a path. i could holiday in a airplane because of the fact the threat is greater precious to me yet in addition i could be bothered approximately secure practices. i does no longer elect to holiday in a small airplane because of the fact I hear approximately them occurring each and every of the time. i does no longer bypass out contained in direction of night till I certainly have an extremely reliable reason. this is while human beings arise lacking in this city. they are asserting they went out contained in direction of the night and have been never considered returned. That makes me think of approximately no longer having freedom to bypass out overdue at night because of the fact i like to be secure. i do no longer walk interior the woods by myself because of the fact this is not secure for a woman to do or possibly a guy. If I had a gun on my part perchance i could. this is my nature to no longer be truly ambitious and volatile and that i think of this is a reliable concern.

2016-12-13 09:17:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't care if Billy and Bobby get married and then rub oils all over their bodies and play hide the Kilbasa, it ain't none of my business!

And whats wrong with pot? You hate Fritos or something? You want to see FritoLay out of business? You cold hearted baztard! You ain't of christ because chirst loves Fritos, no, you want to stave the people who make Fritos to death! You murderous Satan worshiper!

2007-08-16 03:41:31 · answer #10 · answered by The law is a form of tyranny. 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers