2007-08-16 01:56:24 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Yes, and my friends have done it. If the food isn't good i don't and will not pay for somthing that Im not going to enjoy
2007-08-16 01:59:56 · answer #1 · answered by Roger B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, while you're in a first rate eating place, the Chef won't do something on your nutrients in case you sense that is no longer cooked good, they'll recook or replace your order, no subject. in case you sense you ahve to be bothered approximately eating your nutrients after soliciting for a recook, you may re-evaluate the place you're eating. 2nd, eating 0.5 a meal then determining you do no longer like that is no longer a reason for a reimbursement. we at the instant are not a flavor-testing facility, we are a eating place. those of you who make a occupation of sending your nutrients back are the reason that eating places like mine, I artwork in a great eating corporation, recommend recooks or yet another merchandise instead of loose nutrients. As a server, there's no longer something extra annoying than waiting on a table for over an hour, them assuring you that each and every thing is incredible, then once you present the invoice, they want the supervisor because of the fact suddenly the nutrients grow to be terrible and that they do no longer desire to pay for it. because of the fact of this the fees off nutrients and a evening out save becoming is by technique of inexpensive people who're jsut out for a loose meal!!! while you're too low-value to pay on your meal or tip yur server, consume at living house or consume at McDonalds!!!!!
2016-10-10 08:31:23 · answer #2 · answered by boice 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yes! There's no way I'm going to accept a steak I ordered rare that arrives overcooked! Or anything that isn't prepared like I ordered it. Usually everything's fine, but why would I want to eat and pay for something that's wrong, when I could have made it better at home for a lot less money?
2007-08-16 02:01:47 · answer #3 · answered by Clare 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No - I hardly ever go to a restaurant anymore because I know too many people that have worked in them & I have heard HORROR stories about what happens in the kitchen even at very nice restaurants.
I prefer to eat at home where I know who & what & WITH WHAT has touched my food.
2007-08-16 02:00:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and then I do not eat a thing from that restaurant ever again. They're gonna spit in it, for sure. I also say, "If the person that prepared this meal will come out and taste it, I'll gladly pay for it." So...what's for lunch?
2007-08-16 02:03:26 · answer #5 · answered by wwhrd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-08-16 02:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by Mo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If it isn't cooked all the way through, or is the total opposite of what I ordered, then yes. I am not a picky pain in the a*ss that fusses over little things, though.
2007-08-16 02:02:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't usually unless it's something I really don't like or it's really bad. I was a waitress for 12 years and am very sympathic to their job and all the crap they take from customers.
2007-08-16 02:41:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not anymore, but I did a long time ago, when I ordered breakfast. I ordered eggs over easy, and they were not, so I asked for them to be cooked a minute longer.
2007-08-16 02:02:50 · answer #9 · answered by barbwire 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not since the time I tried to do it in Buenos Aires and the chef came out and cursed me out in Spanish (which I didn't understand).
2007-08-16 02:03:18 · answer #10 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋