I'd wait until that unholy trinity met their assigned end and use the flotation device for myself....
so I could turn their pockets out and recover some of the money those collectivist rodents have stolen from us.
2007-08-16 04:37:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Quick, call the Senate back into session and have a hearing on what we should do about this very important decision, we would need of course to debate rather the minority is saved first, or that the woman should be saved first, or that the drunk highest ranking old senator should be: then IF a resolution to save whomever is passed out of the committee, take it to the floor of the Senate for a vote on it as quickly as possible. Remember it takes a 60 percent majority to act on anything in the Senate. Don't think there would be enough votes for anyone of them!
2007-08-16 06:28:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by kickinupfunf 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would place the life preserver ina flat space, sit down on it and watch the leaders of socialism claw each other, to survive. I would connect with Vegas to offer a betting pool on the following categoreis:
1) Will the wicked witch of socialism melt in the water? 10 - 1
2) Will Ted Kennedy experience deja vua and believe he is
swimming across the channel to check into a hotel, to sleep off his "DUI felony manslaughter, leaving the scene of a fatality"? 5 -1
3) Will the liberal media save Obama or do as they intended in his political life, prop him up and then abandon him? 3 - 1
I would also charge admission and offer popcorn to watch the drowned rats sink!
2007-08-16 02:21:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Answer: This is not a trap question posed by liberal trolls…but this is a jovial release for the conservative side. My personal condolences in advance for the insipid tripe that the left will throw at you for this…
There was a joke in the past of Hillary wrestling the backpack from a Scout and attempting to parachute from an airplane. Irony and humor…
One life preserver to three wastes of life…ZEN to the answer!
2007-08-16 01:16:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I would throw the life preserver into an area that put it at an equal distance from all three,then I would sit back and enjoy the sight of these three supposedly compassionate human beings fighting tooth and nail over it. I cannot begin to imagine the incredibly heinous things those three would do to each other in order to be the one who gets it,although I think the biggest fight would be between Hitlery and Obama, Ted has already proven that he is an excellent swimmer and that he is good at leaving other people to drown on their own.
AD
2007-08-16 01:12:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
.i do no longer think of it relatively concerns It grow to be Caroline Kennedy option to make Uncle Teddy sided along with his niece yet neither Obama or Clinton at the instant are no the place close to to being JFK. JFK grow to be a guy earlier to his time The forces of evil so in high-quality condition to assassinate him. in simple terms as they so in high-quality condition to assassinate MLK WE each and each get to make our very own determination on who to assist and vote for President in simple terms like Caroline and Ted Kennedy have. adequate of the BS from final week in the past the S C universal Time to go forward and verify out to understand extra approximately each and each candidate's place on the themes i desire to be responsive to how they plan on ending the conflict fixing the economic device and warding off the recession that we are sliding into in simple terms down the line. The record of issues that want fixed after the mess Bush has made interior the final 8 years is relatively important to the completed usa and thank you to long to record right here.
2016-10-10 08:24:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, what a question and I am completely stumped. Let's see Hillary has a body count of over 50 behind her from white water and other illegal tactics her and bill has done. Teddie has atleast one body that we know of, yet those people in MA keeping relecting him. That just escapes me. Obama doesn't have any bodies as of yet that we know of but he sure likes to play the race card to try and get votes. Pitty. I like the answer where you just throw the life perserver at all three of them and see what happens. Atleast then your conscience is clear because you did try to save all three. Morally that really is the only answer. Because one person can not physically save all three. None of this which I am sure you were hoping for.
But I can not help but turn my thoughts to this remark from Peckerworth ESQ......"You are a hate filled Republican. We have something planned for your kind soon."
What do you think they could possibly have planned for us? Hmmmm.....I know, they are going to steal from the rich and give to the poor to equal out the classes in this country, they are going to take over the tobacco industry, health industry, pharmaceuticals, the farming industry, turn Mother Earth into their new God, take control completely from the parents and create a new Hitler state of youths so their village can raise the children the way they see fit. Let's see did I miss anything.....Oh yes, I forgot, take away all guns so that we can not protect ourselves from an oppressive government, destroy our Constitution and Bill of Rights, adopt the new World Order and we will all live in one big commune. I think that's it.
2007-08-16 01:30:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by RubyUnicorn 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Obvious troll-trap; rather like in the Road Runner cartoon, with a sign pointing to a pile of "free bird seed."
OK, I'll play.
Assuming YOU'RE there observing, I'd slap you upside the head with the life preserver, knocking you in the water, then proceed to pull out the other three.
Hope you can swim...
2007-08-16 11:27:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by John Doe 1st 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'd definately take the life preserver, sell it and donate the proceeds to the poor for 'the common good'. I think that is what they'd want.
2007-08-16 15:25:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'd do like any good Democrat would do. I'd form a taxpayer-funded exploratory committee to investigate and make recommendations as to which one of them most deserved the use of the life preserver, then I'd hold public hearings at taxpayer expense to get input from the population, then I'd probably put the life preserver into storage because we wouldn't want to risk damaging public property now, would we?
2007-08-16 01:05:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
2⤋