Will Dems finally be willing to fight the War on Terror?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070815/wr_nm/palestinians_television_dc

If that's enough, what if we start shipping cigarettes and New York's transfats to terrorists worldwide?

Apparently some on the left don't recognize a little humor. Oh Well.

Rabble, wake up. Dems are disinterested. Harry Reid telling us the war is already lost. Obama saying our troops are just bombing innocent civilians,. Democrats are the ones telling us we need to leave. Democrats are the ones saying we lost. Democrats are the ones blasting our troops. Democrats accusing Bush of being a war criminal while excusing the actions of terrorist.

Answer 1

Now it'sobvious that you are not a democrat or liberal and very obvious that you are not smart if you believe what you are saying because how can you honestly win a war of "terrorism???"there is ALWAYS going to be terrorists!!!This war,right now as we speak,is about stopping Sectarian violence which is not what we came over here for and what do we have to show for it???3700 dead troops,that's what.Democrats are trying to stop a pointless War of which if we were going to win ,woould have been probably 3 years ago.The war is lost because iraq is not reaching it's benchmarks,violence is getting worse,we are spending $10 Billion a month and Nouri Al-Maliki's Government is crumbling.Democrats are fighting the war by letting you misled Americans know that this war is and has been done.

Answer 2

What does PETA (or hamas for that matter) have to do with the current "war on terror" (if thats what we're still calling it)?

Furthermore, why is your question directed at Democrats?
Do you believe that democrats are not currently dying in Iraq? You have another thing coming....

You ought to be ashamed of yourself for trying to make it sound like Democrats are disinterested in what happens to people.

Answer 3

Where is bin Laden?

Will it take an attack on Disneyland to channge the mind of the person who said this??

I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
3/13/02

Please stop this crap. I have family members fighting over there. They are Dems. They would rather be going after bin Laden.

Answer 4

Under which President was the CIA unit to catch bin Laden created? Clinton

Under which President was it disbanded? Bush

Why? No longer a threat. 2003

"National Intelligence Estimate: Al Qaeda stronger and a threat to US homeland" 2007

Republicans are now jumping ship. So you had better include them in your "will Dems finally be willing" scenario.

Answer 5

After passing the Patriot act and authorizing force in Afghanistan and Iraq - how exactly are we not helping in fighting it.
Saying we want it to be fought without breaking our constitution and without actually strengthening the enemy's position is not refusing to fight it.

Answer 6

If cigarettes and trans-fats are good enough for Americans, then they are good enough for terrorists. We can throw in a few Chinese toys for their children.

Answer 7

Only if they invest in the US defense and oil companies so they can profit from it just like any cheese eating politician.

Answer 8

No, I sometimes think the only thing that could wake libs up to the danger and reality of terrorism is the annihilation of Disneyland.

Answer 9

why? someone planning to go after the real terrorists, instead of their pawns?

Answer 10

It's not a matter of party, it's a matter of countries! Duh! They will be though if they win this next election. But if the Republicans win this next one, we will win. Play your card right.