He says what he means and means what he says
why not?
2007-08-15 18:45:16 · 17 answers · asked by ForeverFREE 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Too many Americans already voted for a guy because they thought he was a "straight talker." Because of that, we've had almost seven years of the most horrible administration in the history of our country. Maybe this next time we should elect a SMART guy, someone who actually reads, accepts scientific theorems, understands history and can reason logically.
2007-08-15 18:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Hell no.... that guy could be good at chasing after fugitives, yet i do no longer think of he has the credentials for be a good precedent.U want fairly some skills. maximum persons blame Bush, yet what he does is a no longer basic activity. am effective 0.5 of those people who accuse him, tried to be the president, they gained't be triumphant. So over all , i'm sorry to assert, dogs the Bounty hunter isn't a good determination. i won't vote for him.
2016-10-10 08:10:28 · answer #2 · answered by cracchiolo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thank you for the laugh. Can you Imagine Beth as the first lady? Where would Leland end up? Head of the FBI,CIA, NSA? What about Duane Lee, Youngblood, BabyLisa?
WAIT!!!! What about me? What will I do for entertainment when I cant watch them chase an Icehead around Hawaii?
2007-08-15 20:19:52 · answer #3 · answered by Dj_Ez 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He fits the liberal bill, yes.
Recovered drug addict, convicted of manslaughter, prison time spent, long hair, tattoos and great wardrobe.
Hey, he's right up there with Clinton.
But, seriously everyone I've ever met who has met him says he's an arrogant, self-righteous, demanding ******.
Yes, he's perfect for the libs.
- another candidate that can't win.
Great idea. Sign him up.
2007-08-15 20:27:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry Dude. convicted felons can't run for the Top Dog slot. You have to an un-convicted felon (not caught yet) to get away with it.
2007-08-15 18:55:12 · answer #5 · answered by shdwkat2099 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why not, half of America already is. The other half spent their time trying to convince the world they were Anna Nicole's baby's daddy.
2007-08-15 18:53:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, we need him to go after the Republican fugitives who will be fleeing from Washington after the 2008 elections.
2007-08-15 19:14:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Heck no. Stephen Colbert and Bono should before him.
2007-08-15 21:37:17 · answer #8 · answered by Candy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has been convicted of a felony, and is ineligible to run.
2007-08-15 19:08:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah so him and the mullet crew can go after terrorists. they won't be able to carry actual firearms, but, hey...they'll have their mace and handcuffs!!
2007-08-16 00:14:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋