2007-08-15 16:45:37 · 11 answers · asked by tony r 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
poor and live to 100, dont get me wrong... anyone(including me) would take money at the giving of it... and no doubt it helps with many things, but there is nothing like living... and u can still be a happy person without money
2007-08-15 17:35:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Easy question: I have been poor all my life, would not know how to live as a rich person, so, poor and live to 100, of course.
2007-08-15 17:03:39 · answer #2 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this answer is based on whether the person believes money buys happiness or not. I would prefer to choose what life I want based on health, family and friends not on money which does not guarantee happiness. So basically I cant decide without considering the other factors that would affect my life no matter which choice I make.
2007-08-15 17:55:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
poor and live to a 100. 50 years are not enough for me to spend my money and a 100 years are long enough to earn money. haha
2007-08-15 16:55:24 · answer #4 · answered by not_a_geek 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It comes down to this. Do you value having a lot of things, next to a lot of life.
I personally would be rich and live to 50.
Hey, when it;s your time to go, it's your time to go.
I would rather have a good life, then a bum life.
2007-08-15 16:55:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First enable us to no longer confuse the whole "Catholic " church, with the Roman Catholic church. remember, the Catholic church is the extensive-unfold church or physique of Christ. I agree along with your question. Jesus did no longer come to this international to establish a Church wealthy in wealth, or to become a State, with each and all the trimmings of the international. He had a humble beginning in a staggering, with a manger for his mattress. He lived in a typical abode with a working type father, and an basic mom. He went from place to place in his ministry, wearing no funds. He did no longer have a house of his own. And while he replaced into crucified, he had no possessions to leave to everybody. How this equates with artwork, Palaces, Princes of the Church, etc.etc. I for one fail to work out how that is pronounced to be the church that Jesus based. although, it ought to be pronounced that many Christians, and Christian church homes do stick to the training of Jesus, and do an incredible style of artwork among the destructive, the two in abode missions, and throughout the time of the international. We do desire adequate to stay to tell the story, so i've got faith that Jesus replaced into asserting that we ought to consistently supply what we would use for exhilaration, and keep what we desire for a modest existence style.
2016-10-15 12:13:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor 100, but there are allot of factors that weigh in to this decision. how would my health be at the time of death? Would i have family living with me? allot of possibilities
2007-08-15 16:55:11 · answer #7 · answered by Dee 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i guess i'd say rich and live to 50 cause i don't see myself living any longer anyways so i might as well have some money
...♥
2007-08-15 17:25:23 · answer #8 · answered by ☼ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be rich and die young. it's all about the quality of your life, not the quantity of it,
2007-08-15 19:01:05 · answer #9 · answered by Chanda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish I died 50 years ago... and I'm only 44!
2007-08-15 17:33:07 · answer #10 · answered by birdtennis 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋