No such candidate is possible. As long as the Congress members hold incompatible views on what SHOULD be done, bipartisan is code for surrender your principles.
2007-08-15 14:18:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Jesus Christ tried to unify people and got crucified... Everyone's pretty much been OK with bipartisan bickering ever since (given the consequences). All Joking aside, I think Fred Thompson would be the best candidate to eliminate federal nose poking where it didn't belong, and get the things done that need to get done.
2007-08-15 23:25:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Qui Gon Jay 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have to say that none of them would. The democrats and republicans hate each other's guts. You can't spend years demonizing each other and then expect to have a productive working relationship. Both sides do little more then jockey for a better political position. Even if a person elected was above that sort of thing, he/she would be under pressure from their neocon or liberal base to stick it to the other side.
2007-08-15 22:35:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Giuliani is a divider. Barack Obama is the best candidate to work with Democrats and Republicans. He a fresh guy who hasn't been Washington too long.
2007-08-15 21:29:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brice R 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Barack Obama or Bill Richardson. Not Rudy McRomney. Definitely not Hillary. No one else even has a chance.
2007-08-15 21:46:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Reality is a perspective 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh that's just what we need. More programs, more spending, more taxing, more goofy laws, rules, and regulations.
2007-08-15 23:55:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by John himself 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you kidding? we don't want them passing laws, that cost money. If there is gridlock at least they can't spend so much of our money
2007-08-15 21:36:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by SteveA8 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
romney or clinton
2007-08-15 21:19:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋