Ceres is by far the largest asteroid. Its diameter is almost twice the size of the diameter of the second largest asteroid, and its mass is more than 1/3 the total mass of all the asteroids in the asteroid belt.
It seems highly improbable for Ceres to be so disproportionately larger than the millions of other asteroids in the asteroid belt. Did Ceres win the lottery, or it there a theoretical explanation as to why it is so much larger?
2007-08-15
13:27:14
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
I don't find lithium's argument about exponential distribution all that convincing. It seems like the solar system has some natural clusters, with the smaller rocky inner planets, the larger gaseous outer planets, and the asteroid belt dividing them.
Ceres still seems like an anomaly to me. I like quantum's conjecture about Jupiter being a factor -- maybe Ceres is an "aborted planet" that never got formed due to Jupiter's gravitational influence.
2007-08-16
13:56:55 ·
update #1