I'm arguing with a friend of mine on which battle strategy is more efficient.
He claims that having tons of weaker/cheaper minions is more effective than stocking up on a smaller number of more expensive/efficient warriors.
I of course would prefer one Sith over 10 rebels.
Or one Teutonic Knight over ten Huskarls.
Or one Space Marine over...well you get the picture.
What are your opinions?
2007-08-15 13:12:26 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
Most of the time, numbers are a deciding factor in strategy games. In C&C, if you have 150 machine gunners, that force will bring down any number of tanks and guard towers very efficiently. I would go with numbers over quality. That and if the big unit of cannon fodder is lost, it would cost very little to rebuild the units. If you lose a huge unit, then it would cost dearly.
2007-08-15 13:27:53 · answer #1 · answered by dlbt21 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
to me its not what type of unit its how you use them take starcraft, 2 zerglings are practicly useless against 1 zealot but an army of 100 zealots couldn't stand against a zergling rush the sheer number would overwhelme them. the one might be "stronger" but more then likely numbers will win everytime
2007-08-15 13:22:07 · answer #2 · answered by deadeye401 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
an extremely solid rpg which will take in it sluggish for days on end is Baldurs Gate 2 and the growth, Baldurs gate one is nice too. Starcraft(attitude) is yet another solid one and 0.5 existence(FPS) is a huge one.
2016-11-12 10:48:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋