Is it all Clinton's fault?
2007-08-15 12:57:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A better question is, "When do Neocons EVER actually answer questions here?"
All they ever seem to do is respond with rants they cribbed from Rush Limbaugh or Faux News, regardless of Relevance.
That's why you could ask how the first experiment with Laissez Faire Capitalism ties into the French Revolution and get answers blaming Bill Clinton or Liberals.
Republitrolls can't write and can't read without moving their lips--but they're geniuses at cutting and pasting. Not selecting appropriate rants, mind you, but the cutting and pasting part they have down pat.
Adam the Return, you have to be joking. 3 years of Impeachment Proceedings? 439 unfounded allegations by the Republican House managers' own count? $50 million of the taxpayers money squandered? Dozens of witnesses claiming that Kenneth Starr suborned perjury? An actual perjury trial for a witness who didn't tell the story he made up for her? Is ANY of this ringing a bell, son? Sounds like an outcry to me.
And if Clinton had actually DONE any of that ****--why didn't Republicans bring it up then instead of waiting until the Public started forgetting what REALLY happened?
2007-08-15 13:15:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't ask questions about President Bush. It is all Clinton's fault.
2007-08-15 20:04:00 · answer #2 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It probably depends on the question you are asking. Much of the time on this forum there are "questions" that are actually insults and or propaganda against Bush. This leads Bush supporters to combat against it by bringing up Clinton. Mostly because Clinton gives them a lot of ammunition.
2007-08-15 20:11:15 · answer #3 · answered by Chief Yellow Horse 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree, both have their faults and you cannot justify Bush doing something by claiming Clinton did it.
I do believe it is ok to show why something has occurred and back it up by showing other presidents who have done the very same thing.
2007-08-15 20:05:05 · answer #4 · answered by halestrm 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It has nothing to do with fault.
It has to do with showing the Bush bashers that Clinton was not exactly a model president either.
2007-08-15 20:12:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
because you are asking clinton questions about Pres.Bush.
2007-08-15 20:14:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
mainly because i think people want to know where the outcry was when clinton did these same "horrible, deplorable, heinous acts"
2007-08-15 21:11:34 · answer #7 · answered by Adam of the wired 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's all about double standards. If you don't want it thrown back in your face -- don't do the same thing you criticize others for.
2007-08-15 20:06:00 · answer #8 · answered by JohnFromNC 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
All the right-wing parrots have been programmed to squawk "Clinton" on cue whenever Bushs' failures are mentioned.
2007-08-15 20:02:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
It's an easier answer than a serious analytical one.
2007-08-15 20:01:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋