I've never heard of a landlord having to be responsible for a power outage. He doesn't control the power system, why should he be held responsible for something that's out of his control?
It sucks that all your food spoiled but, no, I don't think the landlord should have to reimburse you. Suck it and go buy new groceries.
Unless, of course, the landlord was some how responsible for the power outage. Then, you might have a reasonable case.
2007-08-15 11:35:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Adam S 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is not a landlords responsibility - he didn't know the breaker was going to go bad so how can you hold him responsible. What would you do about your food if you owned the house?
Some landlords will offer to pay to replace but alot will not. And with Renter's Insurance deductibles usually being about $500 a claim wouldn't make any sense.
2007-08-15 12:20:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by jitterbugj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it was your landlord's problem, why did the energy company fix it? You should get documentation from the energy company that the problem was caused by the landlord (neglect, shoddy maintenance, etc.). Once you are absolutely sure that the landlord is at fault here, demand the money for the cost of spoiled food. If the landlord refuses to pay, take him/her to court.
2007-08-15 11:44:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by grace95838 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Check your lease.
If the power went out as a result of something under the landlord's control, and you suffered a loss as a result of it, he could be held responsible.
But, there is a catch (may be a catch). A lot of leases put a requirement on the tenant to have renters insurance. What that means is that any claim against the landlord for loss of facility use would have to be put to your insurance first.
If the landlord wants to keep you on as a tenant, it would be good relations to kick in a few dollars though. I did that when my tenant lost use of the rental property do to property damage. I refunded him cost for two nights use, and about $100 for miscellaneous expenses.
2007-08-15 11:32:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by cbmttek 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's not the landlords responsibility. Some folks are so ready to sue for **** that doesn't or won't matter a week, a year from now. So sue the power company if you feel so inclined. Good luck collecting that!
2007-08-15 12:27:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if the main circuit breaker feeding your unit went bad, then it went bad, the landlord is not a qualified electrician, therefore he cannot reasonable know the status of all his tenant's electrical back bones and the breakers feeding them, if they go out that's a wear and tear item and thus you are not covered what so ever. he cannot ( and no one will ) guarantee any of his subsystems ( heating / cooling, plumbing, electrical ) from failure, as eventually all subsystems will fail, hence the usual need for renter insurance to cover such contingencies.
2007-08-15 12:43:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it incredibly is an exceptionally long term to maintain kibble, it could pass stale or perhaps moldy if saved in a moist or moist ecosystem, i does no longer purchase greater desirable than a month's properly worth at a time. i purchase in bulk, yet I even have 6 canines, so it basically lasts approximately 2 weeks for a huge sack. while we merely had 2 canines and offered great length dry, it each from time to time have been given moldy in direction of the top, it is not an financial gadget and could make your canines ill. in case you ought to freeze a number of it or use a vacuum sealer, could be properly worth doing.
2016-10-15 11:30:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Phoenix....
here is what the law says...act of god---your responsibility
however...if it was an appliance failure (without act of god) - then it is landlords responsibility.
i would chalk this one up to a learning experience, and call your local insurance company to acquire renters insurance for the future.
good luck :)
2007-08-15 11:37:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Blue October 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Landlord is not responsible for that, if you had renters insurance it would have been covered.
2007-08-15 11:30:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pengy 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
glad you're not my tenant! ridiculous (from the facts you've presented - if you told me that the fridge is part of the lease and the landlord had been previously notified it was not worknig right, and hadn't done anything about it....).
2007-08-15 11:30:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by heart_and_troll 5
·
0⤊
2⤋