Sex offender and new punishments?

Question

Do you think forcing a sex offender to put a sign on his lawn or being forced to put a neon license plate on his car indicating he is a sex offender is added punishment?

Answer 1

yes I do, and I dont' think that sex offender lists should even be made public. I tencourages vigilante jsutice, and once a sentence has been served in the US judicial system it's supposed to be OVER. No more. It should not bar you from anything.

the sex offender category has problems too- consensual sex can land somebody there if the partner regrets it ligter, especially if it's the guy. It's not right, but courts always take the women's side. consnentual sex with somebody who is 17 and 364 days old also lands you in that category. In some states, a bl0wjob does.

Sex should not be enforceable by law except in cases of Rape and incest. Consensual sex between two mature people should not be illegal in any circumstance.

Sorry for the rant...

Answer 2

I think they should go even further and have it tattooed on their forehead!!Signs and license plates can be removed too easy. Too easy for someone to steal someone else's license plate to replace their own. A tattoo is permanent.

Jeff: Are you a child molester? Why do you want to let these monsters go free to hurt another child? These people are never "Cured". They are sick and parents and guardians need to be made aware of them. There is not a court in the world that could dish out a punishment good enough for these slimeballs. If someone was to ever hurt my son like that they had better hope and pray I never get a hold of them before the police do because there would not be a trial...kind of hard when they can't find the body!!

Answer 3

properly, you have woman circumcision, although, i think of that castration is slightly extreme except it incredibly is a repeat criminal it is molesting little ones, wherein case, they should no longer be allowed out of penal complex in any respect, which potential castration isn't necessary. Many many everybody is convicted of intercourse offenses for minor issues, and that i admire the type you're after the female component, very stable question. fairly, you're taking a piss outdoors and you may properly be a intercourse criminal, somebody can lie approximately there age and your going to penal complex, and somebody can merely make up something. Our rules ar too strict for minor offenses. For one occasion, I actually have a chum who's now a registered intercourse criminal, he went to penal complex for some years and could ought to sign in with the police everywhere he is going, so what did he do? He went right into a laundry [lace late at evening to pee, and didnt lock the door, a woman opened the door and screamed, he freaked and circled to work out what replaced into happening, and she or he merely occurred to get a glance at his equipment. in any case, no longer an exact answer to your question, yet i think of that castration ought to pass slightly some distance, as damaging to a existence sentence in penal complex for repeat offenders. additionally, in case you get rid of the intercourse potential from a individual, male or woman, that has an obsession and is performing sexual offenses, they are going to probable aspire to discover a sparkling way of having off, torture, homicide, etc. an incredible style of situations of those that had sexual fantasies that merely took them greater desirable fairly in the event that they could no longer function greater useful.

Answer 4

I would prefer life in prison without the chance of parole ,But i think those are good ideas too ,Than children can see those and know that it is not safe to talk to this person and to keep a far distance .

Answer 5

Yes I do but how do you feel about the following failure to warn? See B.C. 'BILLY Dillies under Summer Camp B.C. 'Billy-style: http://bccondos.ca/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1023#1023)

Summer camp - B.C. 'BILLY-style:
Convicts working alongside kiddie campers in Maple Ridge

The News
Community Newspaper Online
Kids' camp and inmates don't mix
By Monisha Martins
Aug 04 2007

Working at the Allco Fish Hatchery is a coveted job for inmates at Fraser Regional Correction Centre, the best one available. Inside the B.C. Corrections facility at the end of Alouette Road, off 248th Street, *low-risk prisoners from FRCC spend their days outside, tagging fish and remediating streams. Clad in orange and red jumpsuits, prisoners have worked at the adjacent fish hatchery for more than two decades.

Still, Sharlow Leonardo was surprised to see prisoners from the prison working at the hatchery, where she had enrolled her children, ages 10 and 13, in a two-day summer camp run by the Alouette River Management Society. The outdoor adventure camp, advertised in the Maple Ridge summer recreation guide, teaches camping and surviving in the great outdoors. Children learn the basics of map reading, to pitch tents, build emergency shelters and how to tie knots. Not once did the brochure mention inmates worked on the site, Leonardo said. She found out Monday, after her son told her he was within arms' length of a prisoner who was handed an axe. (emphasis added)

... "Parents who don't normally travel to east Maple Ridge, who aren't aware that these grounds are being kept up by prisoners, could then (if advised by offeror that inmates work nearby) make an educated decision," she said. Leonardo pulled her children out of the program after finding out about the inmates.

She said she doesn't care if they are classified as low-risk. "You are incarcerated for a reason. I don't want to send my kids somewhere where it might be unsafe."

At any time, up to four work crews of 12 inmates are working around Maple Ridge. Inmates are paid a token wage by B.C. Corrections. A report to Maple Ridge council in July said inmates' free labour will save taxpayers $265,000 this year alone. One crew works at the Allco hatchery. Another cleans up at the Albion Fairgrounds and Pitt Meadows Regional Airport. Another works at Golden Ears Provincial Park during the summer, while a fourth 12-man crew does small construction jobs for non-profit societies. Two other crews work in Mission, at a tree farm, as well as Zajac Ranch for mentally and physically challenged kids.

David Boag, director of parks and facilities, said staff are considering whether the district should inform parents that inmates work on the site of the ARMS day camp.

He said 11 children registered for the program, which had one supervisor for every three kids. "I don't think it was anticipated that the [prison] crew was going to be there on the day this was planned," Boag said. The crew was carrying out work for B.C. Corrections and did not come into contact with the children, he said.

* Sex offenders and prisoners who are commit violent crimes are not allowed to work in the hatchery, according to Boag. "At no time would the prisoners be interacting with those involved in the program." Jenny Ljunggren of ARMS said more than 3,000 children have participated in the group's spring and summer camp programs since they started four years ago. Of those, only three people have complained about inmates, who have worked at the hatchery since 1979. "We would never put the kids in jeopardy," Ljunggren said. "These inmates are well-screened. The groups that are at the hatchery are pretty much the cream of the crop."

About the 'science' of *classifying offenders:

The fact of the matter remains that, even with improvements, risk assessment will continue to be educated guesswork. (emphasis added) The implications of a risk assessment to an offender are serious and in Canada, could even result in incarceration for an indefinite period. The use of risk assessment to deprive an individual of his or her liberty, based on future conduct, is an issue that needs to be addressed. The public demands to be protected from individuals who will commit more offences, yet the justice system cannot accurately predict whether or not an offender will recidivate. Is it right, then, to incarcerate a person for a longer time than can be justified by their offence, to ensure that he or she does not recidivate? Risk prediction is fallible and so the principle of proportionality- that the severity of a sentence should fit the seriousness of the crime- must not be forgotten. (From the Executive Summary of a report by the John Howard Society, Alberta, 2002.)

Answer 6

i dont think it would be a "punishment". we all deserve to know who is a sex offender. if they didnt want to be "punished" then they should have thought about their actions b4 they did them

Answer 7

Yes, it is added punishment.

Answer 8

Yes and alot more sex offenders are dangerous and should be treated as such!