2007-08-15 08:45:36 · 54 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Yes
2007-08-15 08:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by Miss T 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, why not. If he has good ideas. Then yes i would. Don't really care about sexual orientation. We might need one now since the majority of the presidents are straight and they have been dumb as president. Why are you gay and want to run for president?
2007-08-15 08:51:31 · answer #2 · answered by Angel Eyes 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who says we already haven't?
Does anyone really know what goes on in the presidential and other places private domains?
Would I vote for one as Pres? I will be honest, I would seriously prefer not to, but, if it came to a really good man who seriously had NO sexual agenda and had only the best intentions and the power and skill to do the job? In a heartbeat.
This man would make NO agenda of his personal lifestyle. It would be, just "this is me, now, let's get to business". That attitude would be the only acceptable one.
If he had a way to free America of the bankers stranglehold he would be welcome no matter what. So yeah... I might consider it under such a circumstance.
The same holds for women. BTW You have scuzzbucket her ladyship LADY Rudy Guiliano trying to full both First Lady and President in this running.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8
2007-08-15 10:11:49 · answer #3 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, yes I would. Unfortunately I also believe that it would be a waste of a vote.
Anyone, that believes our racist/prejudiced country will elect a gay man, a minority or a female to office is fooling themselves. I believe anyone who is qualified should be allowed to run our country. Those of you who feel as i do are in the minority.
Sad but true.
2007-08-15 08:51:12 · answer #4 · answered by Mayor Adam West 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not just in virtue of his being gay, but just being gay wouldn't prevent me from voting for a candidate that I thought was suitable. It wouldn't really be an issue unless the candidate made it part of his campaign, hopefully.
2007-08-15 08:48:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, homosexuality is immoral before the Lord. Thus, he would have no morals to guide the country. Isnt the Lord the ultimate Lawgiver? If the president is gay, is he following the Lord? No.
2007-08-15 13:09:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why Not Id Vote Anyone Better Then Bush and if hes best canitdate and it doent matter if hes gay as long hes a great leader
2007-08-15 08:48:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
if I considered him to be the best person for the job, I would vote for him.
2007-08-15 15:51:54 · answer #8 · answered by Panda 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, if he was diplomatic, showed good values and had the sense not to make his sexual orientation a major part of his political strategy.
2007-08-15 08:52:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course!..better than a depressed man like Bush
2007-08-15 08:48:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋