Something must be dreadfully wrong with them. I bet they burn soon in a convenient fire.
2007-08-15 04:05:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by ken 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
Do you really need to ask why Hillary Clinton will not release her personal records? Look at her history. Hillary Clinton is the most vilified woman in the history of American politics. For sixteen years the Republicans have examined every aspect of her life and used it to attack her.
The Whitewater inquiry turned up nothing, but that was not important to propagandists like Rush Limbaugh, who continued to scream about smoke and fire long after the flames were out. During the Lewinsky affair (pun intended) she was ridiculed and her private life was exposed, despite her being the wronged woman. Time has shown that most of the Republican leadership who were screaming about Bill Clinton's sex life were adulterers, scam artists and/or pedophiles, which calls the sincerity of their outrage into question.
More recently it has become very personal indeed. Her physical appearance (as if that matters) is subject to ridicule, and even the way she sings the national anthem was criticized. If she doesn't sing she hates America, if she does she is off key! The abuse has become petty and vindictive, and there will be no appeasing the abusers.
So why should she release her personal records? People like you will only look for things to take out of context or magnify beyond proportion. If she bought a toothbrush made in the wrong place, somebody at Fox News would call for a Congressional inquiry. Senator Clinton does not have an obligation to provide her enemies with more ammunition. Only in the irrational partisan gutters of contemporary American politics could any of her opponents imply she was committing some crime by failing to do so.
The tone and tenor of your question are in and of themselves proof that she would be a fool if she did. All you want is a little more excrement to throw around, but you will have to make it up like you usually do.
2007-08-15 04:25:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
One could also ask why Bushies won't testify before Congress or why the Reagan library won't open records about Iran/Contra or why other presidential librarys have infomration not available to the public. People read too much into it. Maybe there is some thing in them that would be twisted and molded clear out of proportion by her opponents. To save the country the hassle of more propaganda and lies (we've seen enough for a lifetime in the last 6 years) she doesn't allow them to be released. I wonder what her opponents have locked up and unavailable that are as bad or worse. People act as if this is a big deal. They don't want to talk issues but to make personal attacks because when they talk issues they lose big time and Hillary wins. They know that so they pick on every iota of a thing they can find to avoid talking real issues and to discredit her.
2007-08-15 04:10:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary's records as First Lady? In what elected position did she serve? What official function did she have during those years? None!
All her "records" are personal, which is why it is all the more important for us to see them, revealing how much power she was taking without any proper Constitutional authority.
The woman is a menace to society and the American Consitution who will make, if elected President, the so-called "abuses of power" by the current President seems like triffles in comparison. Be prepared for the loss of all your rights, starting with the Bill of Rights.
2007-08-15 04:09:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dave_Stark 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama's gotta love this. He HAS no record to pass back and look at. The "inheritor to the JFK Legacy" ...good All you desire is a good speech author and the delivery of a televangelist. remember- that Rezko is going to trial around Feb 25 - and specific unnamed Illinois officers have been suggested who did favors for Rezko - Chicago Tribune, insinuating that its Obama...we've been completed a disservice by employing the clicking and Obama himself for no longer vetting his candidacy until that is too previous due- Clinton's information will teach that she did voluminously extra desirable than Obama has completed in his lifetime.
2016-10-10 06:51:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by bjorne 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is like everyone else that is tied up with Washington.
She has a lot of closeted skeletons she does not want anyone to know about because if they did she wouldn't have a snowballs chance in hell of getting into office
2007-08-15 04:17:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by From Yours Trully 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because she is trying to make it a fair race for the presidency, if she released those records then the public would see how great she is and the rest of the candidates would not have a chance of winning.
2007-08-15 04:03:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Curtis 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
Because it is damaging and she knows it. There have been many books written about her viciousness and meanness but these she can fight. She can't fight her own facts so they must be hidden at all costs.
2007-08-15 04:05:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Too many answers, partisan side of brain aching, must attack Bill...argh !!!
2007-08-15 04:07:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Greg 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Probably the same reason our pres. has never released any of his records.
2007-08-15 04:06:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Old Guy 2
·
1⤊
3⤋