I'd like to read it. The courts say he didn't do it. Popular opinion and civil court says he did. I think he did. I'd rather this be published so those fence sitters can understand that he did do it. And is proud of killing them.
However, I do understand Denise Brown's angst over the whole thing. But in the long run, I think publishing it would be best, even for her and the Goldmans. That way everyone can see what a monster he truly is.
The saving grace of this is if the proceeds were given to the family or to a women's abuse shelter or some such.
2007-08-15 02:42:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥Lucifer♥ 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh my, he sure is letting the cat out of the bag. He wants to tell the truth that he is guilty but so far the authority is not listening.
2007-08-15 02:42:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Patches 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's a man turning a profit from committing murder. Why not let all prisoners out on the street and hook them up with publishers?
2007-08-15 02:52:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by jsardi56 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
OJ is a sicko. I havent read the book but im totally going to!!! (i have to finish a load of books first)
I totally agree with the person above me!!!!!!!!!!
2007-08-15 03:04:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ilovefredgeorge 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i thought it was sick when OJ wanted it out and i think it is sick that the goldmans are putting it out too.
dont get me wrong, i feel really bad for them but this is clearly just a move to make money.
2007-08-15 02:38:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by lenmac71 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't care about O.J.
2007-08-15 02:36:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Q guy 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bad idea. Poor taste.
2007-08-15 02:40:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i saw people discussing it on the Today Show...today...im not really sure what i think of it yet...
2007-08-15 02:37:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would have been better titled, "I did it, and I'm proud of it!"
2007-08-15 02:36:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by kja63 7
·
4⤊
0⤋