How are the suicide bombings in Iraq the fault of George Bush? To me it just looks like it's the fault of tribal inbreeding and religious insanity.
2007-08-14 23:12:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
i dontthink they ARE bushs fault............and i agree that terrorism has to be addressed and perhaps fought...........but why so heavy handed.............its playing into suicide bombers etc hands........
2007-08-14 23:51:31 · answer #1 · answered by surfergirl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first suicide bomber was a 12 year old boy in Iran in the days of khomeini who threw himself under a lorry and blew it up. Because of that self sacrifice it has become a weapon of the terrorist.
You cannot blame George Bush for suicide bombings, but you can blame him for putting America and American lives at risk. Iraq was a disaster waiting to happen. Bush & Blair were warned that civil war would break out after the war, and now it has. You are now reaping the consequences of going to war. You cannot back out now. If you do it will be a lack of resolve. You are there for the foreseeable future. There will be many more American and British casualties.
George Bush & Tony Blair will be judged by history, but history may be a long way off yet.
2007-08-15 06:25:29 · answer #2 · answered by soñador 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well I would not say it is only the fault of G W Bush, but before the US invasion of IRAQ there was no suicide bombings there.
So the invasion has surely started something. And since the invasion was decided by G W BUSH and his advisors ( more by his advisors I think), then indirectly imho G W BUSH has some responsibility in the suicide bombings happening in IRAQ
Just my opinion
2007-08-15 06:20:54 · answer #3 · answered by Pierre R 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The bombings are not directly his fault. They are the fault of the people doing them and the people controlling them.
However, Bush is the decision maker, and his decisions led to the power vacuum in one of the most desired pieces of land on the planet. He was warned the invasion would increase terrorism, but he did it anyway.
If Bush wants to be the 'Decider' thats fine, but that means that it was his decision to create the situation that allowed for all of this.
2007-08-15 06:46:11 · answer #4 · answered by Showtunes 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whether it would be happening or not, none of it would need to bother us had Georgie not made the single-handed decision to invade Iraq, even if he had to lie a blue streak to justify it.
Now it's "You broke it, you bought it." Claims that it was already broke when we got here will not hold water.
2007-08-15 06:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. Souldogs 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Explain to me why someone who is a supporter of war in Iraq isn't in the marines over there on the front lines? You must be another jew that wants the US to fight and die in place of you!
2007-08-15 06:35:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's true, but without the invasion of iraq, these bombings would not happen
2007-08-15 06:18:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I agree with you: what will happen when we leave Iraq. My grandson has been there for three years now. He said the Iraqis are terribly afraid that when we leave, there'll be mass killings, there'll be retribution to pay for the people going along with the U.S. It'll be another Pol Tat and Thailand, another purge, then what? who will go in then and help them?
2007-08-15 06:32:38 · answer #8 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
may be you r right but who is the pupet master??
2007-08-15 07:09:01 · answer #9 · answered by mustapha m 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he started it all.
2007-08-16 00:51:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋