Should I do this FF trade?

Question

Okay heres the deal.. 8 total teams.. and scoring..

Completions (.5)
Passing Yards (25 yards per point)
Passing Touchdowns (6)
Rushing Attempts (.20)
Rushing Yards (15 yards per point)
Rushing Touchdowns (6)
Receptions (1)
Reception Yards (15 yards per point)
Reception Touchdowns (6)

My starting lineup and bench ..


QB Drew Brees
QB Donovan McNabb
WR Steve Smith
WR Torry Holt
WR Donte' Stallworth
RB Larry Johnson
RB Reggie Bush
TE Kellen Winslow
W/R Rudi Johnson
W/R Laurence Maroney

BENCH

WR Jerricho Cotchery
WR Devery Henderson
WR Eddie Kennison
WR Santonio Holmes
RB Jerious Norwood
QB Trent Green

and the trade:

I give:

QB Donovan McNabb
WR Steve Smith
RB Reggie Bush

I get:

QB Ben Roethlisberger or Brett Favre
RB LaDainian Tomlinson




PLEASE give in-depth opinions about the trade and my starting roster.


Best answer gets 10 POINTS!! YAY!!





Thanks all!

I didnt draft LJ or Maroney.. acquired by trades for Thomas Jones, Tony Romo, Plaxico Burress and Willie Parker with Romo and T. Jones on my bench.

Answer 1

I would not do this trade, mainly because of your scoring system. LT2 is a very valuable player, but in a PPR league, Steve Smith and Bush are both top 10-15 players and McNabb has the benefit of .5 pts pre com. With PPR, Bush rank goes up a lot, last year he had 88 rec. with Deuce playing most of the time. This year Bush should be getting more carries, and be apart of the offense more. He can easily get 85-90 carries, which boosts him up past certain players, possibly top 6-8. Smith is a WR who gets a lot of rec. and yards to that matter. Him getting about 90-100 rec. can boost him up to a top player over many RB's. LT2 does benefit from the .2 pts pre carrie, but when you think about it if he gets 300-350 carries, which is about 60-70 pts more but he does not cancel out Bush and Smith.

The trade would look like this:
Bush and Smith for LT2, sounds far in regular scoring, but for you, you would be loosing more here. Also, your RB's are really strong already, and your WR's are weak, so losing Smith would hurt you even more. You have to keep Smith and Bush based on your team and the scoring.

Mcnabb for Roth/ Favre-McNabb staying healthy can turn into a top tier player, and be top 3 Qb for sure. He can dominate, and with a healthy team he will lead your team with many points-you would definately be losing here.

Bush and Smith will score more points than LT2, thanks to the scoring and your need for WR's

McNabb will easily outscore roth/Favre and should be a top QB.

Do not to this trade for sure!

Answer 2

Umm, you're telling me you have a competitive league, and you managed to draft these eight?

QB Drew Brees
QB Donovan McNabb
WR Steve Smith
WR Torry Holt
RB Larry Johnson
RB Reggie Bush
RB Rudi Johnson
RB Laurence Maroney

I don't care if it's an eight team league, and I don't care that you got LJ and Maroney via trades, you need to play with opponents that know what they're doing!

Having said all that, take the trade. You obviously have no need for McNabb nor Smith, but you might as well pitch LJ or Rudi in there instead of Smith, since you're stacked at RB anyway.

Answer 3

any trade for LTis worth it. You might lose some points for losing Mcnabb but you have Brees and some good wideouts and a stud at the other RB positon. You have a lot of good players sill and with LT a TD Machine always good. Who did the ohers guys pick that you have this many good players. Look to get in bigger league next year.

Answer 4

This is close, but you should do the trade. Going from McNabb who can easily get injured to Ben who will have mosnter year and is very underated.

Getting the top player Ladanian for Bush is great and all you lose is Steve Smith, but you can get other good receive from the waiwers.

Answer 5

Take the deal! Tomlinson is the best player in all of fantasy football. McNabb will get hurt and you never know what Smith and Bush will do. You know what LT will do. And take Favre instead of Ben. Favre will have an excellent year!

Answer 6

i could desire palmer over bulger. palmer is the consensus #2 quarterback for this season, mutually as bulger is ranked 5-7 in maximum places. palmer continues to be getting greater useful and he has 2 great wideouts rather of a million. the two ought to positioned up extensive numbers, yet palmer ought to positioned up some greater factors each and each week. i think of the bengals will lean greater in direction of than the rams because of the fact they have an elite RB in steve jackson. (rudi is extremely stable yet no longer interior a similar type as jackson) i could desire westbrook over bush. bush is greater dynamic, yet he gets fewer touches in keeping with sport, and that i admire westbrook because of the fact he has an prolonged song record (nonetheless he's slightly services to wreck.) Westbrook is the guy who will carry the rock in philly, mutually as bush would be used in diverse approaches (spelling deuce, at wideout, as a decoy, etc.) and the saints have a ton of weapons, so i anticipate to work out the ball get unfold around greater desirable than in philly (who will place self assurance in westbrook and mcnabb to be phenominal)

Answer 7

i would the trade first of all any time u cna get the #1 fantsasy player 2nd of allif u have choice of the qb take roethlisberger he throw less int and while losing smith hurts one of the plus witl lt is he catches alot of balls also and moving cothcery into your other wr spot wont hurt either

Answer 8

Dont do it make him give you another running back because Donvon + smith + reggie is more then farve/ben and LT

Answer 9

Your lineup is fine stick with it!