By this time She had already had parts of Poland, France, Austria-Hungary, Czechoslovakia etc under its control. Why didn't it consolidate its gains but instead attack Britain and USSR?
Wouldn't it be better it had waited for the next 3 years to strengthened its arm and troops instead. Why the rush?
2007-08-14 20:24:54 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
All we should say is "Thank God" because had Hitler consolidated his men and arms, along with his Allys in Europe, he would have had the strongest army in the world. Thank goodness he was greedy or, crazy, if it was syphilis that he had, we can thank something for his warped thinking.
In his mad rush to take Russia he wrecked havoc with his troops and decimated them. He should have taken a lesson from Napolitan in the earlier years, the same exact thing happen to him.
The Russian winters killed thousands of his troops, no one came back from the Russian frontier. Those that were left were ambushed and killed by the thousands for there incursion into the " Mother-land"
2007-08-15 03:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Italy, Spain and Portugal were all under control of Fascist dictators who where either allied to our friends with Hitler. So there was nowhere else to expand in Europe.
2007-08-15 05:03:33 · answer #2 · answered by eorpach_agus_eireannach 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would have been much, much greater for Germany to do what you said.
Aren't we all glad that Hitler was obsessed with ruling the world and opend two fronts against all military reasoning.
Whew! If only..........
g-day!
2007-08-15 01:30:13 · answer #3 · answered by Kekionga 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because a mad man and his mad gang was ruling the country.
2007-08-14 23:59:57 · answer #4 · answered by mertev 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋