2007-08-14 18:27:01 · 12 answers · asked by gm8888 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
correction phrase >will accept a personal<
2007-08-14 18:28:18 · update #1
I sure hope you have resolved that issue, because it is a certainty the challenge will be forthcoming. The implant is being offered in test business settings already and seems benign and I read that it can't be removed. Solent green!!!!!!!
2007-08-15 08:39:00 · update #2
corrected spelling "soylent"
2007-08-15 08:40:13 · update #3
Personally, I would not. I would simply refuse.
I had to have a US Federal background search for clearance to work someplace. That means my fingerprints are on file. I see my dentist regularly, and my charts are up to date. If all else fails, I have a device in my heart to repair a defect, and as a last ditch effort to identify my dead body, someone would only need to remove it and look up the serial number. In addition to that, I have all the normal things like photo ID, a passport, a voter registration card, etc. Uncle Sam and the powers that be can already identify me in a variety of ways. If they want to put an implant in me, they are going to find that categorically say NO. My dog has a microchip because she could get lost. I am not a dog who might get lost or stolen, so no implants for me, thanks.
2007-08-14 18:33:58 · answer #1 · answered by Bronwen 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No reason is acceptable. I see it as a step towards the biblical prophecy where the anti-christ has come to power, and has "marked" people (implanted radio frequency identication chips) so that he can easily keep track of who is obedient to him and who is against him, and will behead anyone who does not accept the mark/chip. That's why I wouldn't accept one. God is against it.
2007-08-14 19:19:27 · answer #2 · answered by dtmpulse 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no yet i might settle for a working laptop or pc chip implant that connects my suggestions wirelessly, to the internet.... i ponder whether i will nevertheless be alive whilst they get that one on the cabinets...
2016-12-30 14:06:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None. Next question?
2007-08-14 18:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by wyomugs 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i can't see any reason to accept such an infringement of my personal liberty
2007-08-14 18:40:17 · answer #5 · answered by Jane w 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No reason
2007-08-14 18:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None. I don't even want to do it to my dog.
2007-08-14 19:51:59 · answer #7 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
wont lose your stuff or have to carry it with you
2007-08-15 00:16:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no reason for it, i would never get it.
2007-08-14 19:08:07 · answer #9 · answered by Reality Has A Libertarian Bias 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
UNDER ABSOLUTELY NO CONDITIONS, EVER.
2007-08-14 19:14:54 · answer #10 · answered by ZoneRider 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋