I want my babys name to be unique and originle.
2007-08-14 17:46:47 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Baby Names
Do you like the alphabet?
2007-08-14 17:56:53 · answer #1 · answered by Caitlin J 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Wow. I am afraid your baby might grow up frustrated that no one can pronounce or read his name. It's a little much. There are so many syllables that you actually lose the name in putting it all together. Unique and original names are great, but that one just doesn't roll off the tongue easily.
How about Angelo or Angel, or even Mikelo.
2007-08-14 18:07:55 · answer #2 · answered by jennsuzy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hm, a little too long in my opinion. Michael Angelonnius would be a whole lot better, to split it between the first and middle name. Either that or make his middle name Michelangelonnius. Better yet have his name be Michael Angelo.
2007-08-14 18:06:43 · answer #3 · answered by Somaesthesia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing wrong with unique and original, but it should also be a name he can spell. Can you imagine this little 5 yr. old trying to spell that? He'd spend most of his time correcting how people say or write his name.
A name is very important....it means nothing if people around you can't say it properly.
2007-08-14 18:04:01 · answer #4 · answered by ~Hooper~ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats way too long of a first name. I love unique names myself, but keep them short and simple, your child will love you for it!! Try something like cooper or cade. Those are names that you don't hear alot.
2007-08-14 18:06:43 · answer #5 · answered by deidre_laine_2004 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i cant even pronounce it correctly. your desire for him to have an original name should include thoughts of his entire future with the name you decide to give him. maybe if his fisrt name was original, but not so long-then you can give him a long middle name to compensate your needs. would you be calling him michael or mike for short? if so, then why give such a long name?
there are many original names to consider..
if you put stephen in front of that you'll have stephen michelangelonnius ____________. that's pretty original!
2007-08-14 18:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by dacook 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats not unique and "original".....it just looks like u had the name michelangelo and u added a bunch of stuf at the end. its very baddddd! unique doesnt mean u need to go crazy with letters.
2007-08-14 18:00:46 · answer #7 · answered by Lauren 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you might want them to have a unique and original name but remeber that one day the baby is going to have to learn how to spell that name and you don't want it to be to hard
2007-08-14 18:16:46 · answer #8 · answered by Sheena L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't pronounce that and I doubt he will thank you for it. even if you did name him that he'd probably end up going by Michael anyway, which is not unique. I would keep looking.
2007-08-14 18:02:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't think any names should be over 6 or 7 letters.. max. it would be shortened to michael.. or mike... so why not do him a favor and just call him mike? or Angel... or Onnius for that matter lol.
2007-08-14 18:05:34 · answer #10 · answered by JaneDo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all you can't even spell "original" correctly, how will you or anyone else for that matter spell that name? It is horrible.
2007-08-17 17:09:23 · answer #11 · answered by Rhode Island Red 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋