English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I can think of several examples of Socialism self destructing (The Soviet Union being the best) but not one where it has lasted more than a few decades.

2007-08-14 16:38:11 · 20 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Most regimes don't last very long, socialist or otherwise.

2007-08-14 16:41:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Under the true socialist state you earn what everyone else earns. There are no incentives so if you do not want to work hard then don't. The guy next to you will shovel your load so why bother, take home pay is the same. Kind of like a Union job except the promotions don't happen. Eventually no one works, no production, no money! In the end you still have to be a capitalist and earn an income so the system goes broke.

Look at China, lots of rusty factories standing around from the socialist days but they have not run for many years and even when they had employees they produced little and have only generated the attitude that has cheapened Chinese goods in the eyes of the world.

2007-08-15 01:58:44 · answer #2 · answered by hitech.man 3 · 1 2

Read George Orwell's famous book "Animal Farm"

it pretty much sums up the problem with socialism. The ones who run the show don't live the same way as the people they dictate to, and while it sounds good "to each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities" it ends up being "to those who gain power, from those who lose it in the process" and quite typically, legal rights are dimished or non-existent, and rule is by people and whim rather than by law and custom.

Socialism is a pipe dream, and really just another form of dictatorship with the leaders expounding on the wonders of their economic system, and degrading capitalism because their countries are usually run down, and not very productive, so they need someone else to blame.

European economies are suffering, they have no flexibility in their workforce, they have higher unemployment than the USA. The ideas they promote, like permanent jobs once hired sound great at first, but what firm would hire someone they could never fire? Alan Greenspan explained this very well when asked about the European economic system, and they don't have the flexible labor force we have in the USA, so new businesses are harder to create in Europe, and self-employment -- well forget it.

Cradle to grave help from any government is a complete disincentive to work hard, create new things, take risks, etc. And such systems tend to fail economically as they grow because the cost of social welfare far exceeds the capacity of the economy to support it. This is why Rome eventually collapsed, too much welfare, too many citizens, and not enough economic activity to sustain it.

Jeff

2007-08-15 16:56:36 · answer #3 · answered by Dr.T 5 · 1 1

Nope. you're complicated socialism with communism or totalitarianism. Socialist Democracies have been very effectual in lots of international locations around the globe. effortless education, wellness, and time-honored of residing are bigger in a lot of those international locations than they're interior the U. S.. inner maximum companies nevertheless function and make a earnings. Republicans desire to pass back to the Gilded Age whilst the city undesirable languished in slums and artwork 14 hours an afternoon for slave wages, and there have been hard work riots another week. Laissez faire capitalism is nearly as unfavorable as Soviet-form communism. Democrats see that a mixed economic device of regulated capitalism with a stable social protection internet is the main suitable device. And to Frank, socialism does no longer bring about communism. supply a historic occasion of whilst that got here about? The Soviet Union grow to be no longer in any way socialist in the past the 1917 revolution - that they had an extremely capitalist economic device. Cuba had a corrupt yet capitalist device in 1959. Vietnam had a colonial economic device imposed by employing the French in the past they went communist. China grow to be capitalist in the past 1948. Sorry, yet your fact is in simple terms fake. And as for persons who earnings from socialism, it is human beings like certainly everyone over the age of sixty 5, any baby unlucky adequate to be born into poverty, and every person who has ever attended public college. Darn those corrupt fat cats! And to organic Rock, look on the analyze and you will see it relatively is conservatives who're way plenty extra probable to need an authoritarian chief in cost of them. back, you're conflating communist dictatorship with an economic device that purposes properly in democracies. i do no longer blame you even with the incontrovertible fact that, on account which you have been brainwashed by employing good wing extremists.

2016-10-10 06:18:24 · answer #4 · answered by hyler 4 · 0 0

There has actually not been a real world example of true socialism. What we have seen is a mutilated version of communism. The whole point of socialism is that a government is not required, and people work for the common good. If you want examples of Socialism working, just look at Scandinavia. They are the closest the worlds had to a true socialist society.

2007-08-14 16:50:18 · answer #5 · answered by lachieboy 2 · 2 3

Because usually complete socialism is only used as a tool to rest power from the people, for a nationalist or fascist agenda. Kind of like a promise of security to do the same thing.

2007-08-14 16:52:34 · answer #6 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1 2

The USSR was a mix of Communism and a Dictatorship; not Socialism. There is a big difference between the two.

Socialism is what most European countries are today, and they've never been more successful. Look at Russia now that it's Socialist. It's booming.


Socialism isn't evil. It's the only thing that can even out the playing field between government and the individual.

2007-08-14 16:47:55 · answer #7 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 2 5

the prerequisite to a true socialism is a true democracy. only then society can have educated people who then and/or democratic system get will respect socialism and so on. evolution goes on. change is inevitable, for sure capitalism isn't the end of change unless it is the end of human being and the world! peace

2007-08-14 17:07:31 · answer #8 · answered by macmanf4j 4 · 1 2

er... how long have European nations had democratic socialism?

quite a while now... and it has some problems... but the U.S. has problems too...

and I'm unaware of a pure capitalist nation lasting even half as long as the Soviet Union?

The U.S. has many socialist programs at work currently that is no where near pure captialism...

2007-08-14 16:48:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Socialism basically doesn't allow any free enterprise.. somebody has to pay money for services but since everyone is on the dole; they just run out of money, then services dwindle because nobody is working and people need to eat and so another theory bites the dust. :: poof:::

2007-08-14 16:44:40 · answer #10 · answered by Tapestry6 7 · 3 2

Ya even Social Security is going down the tubes. Biggest pyramid scheme ever invented.

2007-08-14 16:45:20 · answer #11 · answered by vladoviking 5 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers