I watched that the other night and I was disgusted at it. I cannot believe that such religious right-wing anti-choice fundie crap does so well in the box-office.
Why didn't she get an abortion? She should have gotten an abortion and not had the kid. This is clearly propaganda created by the vast right-wing conspiracy to make young women believe that if they don't get an abortion then everything will be ok. Well it wont be ok. If a women doesn't abort the baby then her life will be ruined and she will be forced into a situation of legal-rape, aka marriage. This movie should have went the PRO-CHOICE route and had her get an abortion, not be forced to have it.
2007-08-14 15:56:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anne Tago Nistic 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I'm not even close to be considered right-wing. I am pro-choice person who loves gay and black people.
2007-08-14 16:04:33 · update #1
She didn't go the pro-choice route. In the movie she went that route because the writer, A MAN, decided thats the route she was going to go. It's not right.
2007-08-14 16:12:34 · update #2
You're clearly a right-winged troll who is immitating a left-winger to make fun of pro-choice people, or just give them the reputation is horrible closed-minded robots.
2007-08-14 16:01:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. You need to calm down a bit because it's only a movie. I thought it was pretty close to what really happens in this situation. Neither of them were too excited about the prospect of having a baby but once she decided to keep it they both tried to get their acts together.
And an abortion angle is probably not the best to use for a movie that's a comedy. Go rent Cider House Rules if you want to see a storyline about that.
Smile friend!
2007-08-14 19:16:25 · answer #2 · answered by gh0st 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I enjoyed it. It's a movie! If young women take it as more then that then they do not comprehend reality from fiction. And quite frankly if you don't understand the difference then their to young to even watch the movie or have sex at that matter! She wasn't forced to have it, she made a choice. She also had a good job that even if the father decided not to stick around she could still afford her child. It isn't a conspiracy for young women to go out and get pregnant, i mean if you look at it she was worried she was going to get fired which is honestly a big worry for single working mothers, yes things did work out for her, but what romantic comedy have you seen that things don't just work out?
2007-08-14 16:36:45 · answer #3 · answered by kazee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she got an abortion then the movie would have been 20 minutes long you moron. Its just a movie! there is no conspiracy or any sort of "propaganda" as you claim. You sound like a nut and I feel sorry for any guy that dates you. I wish your mom was PRO-CHOICE
2007-08-14 16:14:21 · answer #4 · answered by crackr 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i just wanted to say that wlucynsky needs to get her facts straight, sweetie, if you choose to have the baby, then you are pro LIFE, pro CHOICE is when the woman chooses to have an abortion...as for the movie, i think that they chose the safer route for the movie, because if they would have had her choose to get an abortion, people would be picketing the movie and other stuff, and it would turn into a religious battle over a movie...i am not saying that they should have made her get an abortion in the movie, i am saying that the studio just wanted to avoid a lot of drama surrounding the movie, cause they just want to make money lol...but i DO see where you are comming from
2007-08-14 18:48:23 · answer #5 · answered by Lissy B 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I loved the movie, personally. And it DID go the pro-choice route. She chose to have the baby.
2007-08-14 16:09:16 · answer #6 · answered by wlucynsky 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just wanted to say that Lissy B needs to get her facts straight, sweetie, Pro-Choice is exactly that a choice. Just because you have children doesn't mean you are pro-life! Some people have children and then have abortions.
2007-08-18 10:23:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"goddamn them?" who're you, Charlton Heston? they're Asgardian gods, no longer Vikings. they arrive from an astral plane, and you are going to be able to purely guess at how that is integrated into the MCU. My thought is that once Vikings have been around interior the MCU, they could desire to have seen the 'Gods' at artwork, and made books on what they observed and have been advised, and that unfold around the globe as evidenced in that e book Skarsgård grow to be examining interior the movie. after all he and his son Alex are Scandinavian IRL, and you do no longer see them complaining! And as for 3 hundred, Frank Miller tweaked the historic previous to make it good entertainment, so do no longer commence crying.
2016-10-10 06:16:44 · answer #8 · answered by hyler 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I also hated that movie. Even of Grey's Anatomy, Katherine Heigel can't act.
2007-08-14 16:01:51 · answer #9 · answered by white_ghetto_supastar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋