Seriously, please be specific. She's a capitalist through and through, not a socialist. That's a proven fact since she has sat on so many corporate boards including Walmart. And, she gets her primary funding from corporations as laid out in the July issue of Fortune magazine. Yet, she has tons of experience in the senate and the white house. Please be specific in what scares you about her. You may say she wants power, but what man who is running for president doesn't want that too?
2007-08-14
14:46:46
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
EDIT: She is not linked to a murder. If you have proof of this provide it. Otherwise you're talking out of your butthole. I'm no Hilary fan, but that is a ridiculous statement. Start thinking responsibly and researching your statements before you post such nonsense.
2007-08-14
15:25:58 ·
update #1
Scenic point, some very good points you raise. Do you have proof? Not that I don't believe you but I'd like to see the research myself. Also, are you this critical of the Bush administration and their shady dealings and the fact that he let Skooter Libby off which is a totally impeachable offence according to the Constitution. And, do you have proof of those pardons and how close the people he pardoned were to him. From what I understand and read it was only one or two people that he knew. Unlike the Bush Sr. administration who pardoned over 12 people for Iran contragate and some of them work for Bush jr. now.
2007-08-14
15:31:01 ·
update #2
Nothing. Bush and GOP supporters are just afraid that she might bring back "accountability and integrity" back to the White House--for real this time.
And leave them out of a job.
2007-08-14 15:34:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am not against Hillary, but If some are calling her dangerous, I will acknowledge fixing health care will not be good for anyone getting rich on the current system. I'll even go so far as to concede to the notion that Islamic nations like Iran may, perceive America as weak for having a women as president. Personally those dangers are not worth dismissing considerations of the candidate.
Okay, the whitewater thing is a good point too.
2007-08-14 14:55:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by in pain 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Her "experience" in the White House is that of being the First Lady...NOT a lawmaker.
As far as her Senate "experience"...8 yrs as a junior from NY a seat her hubby BOUGHT for her with his contacts....
NOT impressive
As far as what makes her dangerous....
She legislates thru POLLS ...not conviction....which ever way the wind blows so will her "opinion"
She is as crooked as crooked gets....or have we forgotten Whitewater and the missing papers that were MIRACULOUSLY found on the dinning room table at the White House some 3 months after they were reported lost to a Congress subpoena?
She wants SOCIALISTIC programs like socialized medicine and called in "experts" to help her set it up under her husband...
These "experts" were the same ones FIRED by Canada because the system they setup was BANKRUPTING the economy...and providing less than Minimum care....
Her judgment is lacking...as is her integrity...
Why hasn't she put up a resolution in Congress to end the war.....
BECAUSE SHE KNOWS THAT IT WILL NOT PASS...
but she voted for the war on Intel that was supplied by her hubbies boys...
She blames GW for ALL of the problems but offers NO solutions....typical Dem...All talk...no action
THAT'S SCARY
2007-08-14 15:02:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by consrgreat 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Lets see :
- they used confidential FBI records to comb thru files on Republicans looking for trash.
- freed over 200 convicted criminals, INCLUDING their own friends convicted in the WHitewater scandal, on their way out the door.
- Hilary would brook NO "compromise" on HER Health Care reform package, even though people with more experience than her said it had big problems. She just overrode them. And it failed in Congress.
- She's had no real impact on New York, other than Dog n' Pony shows. What real legislature has she sponsored/ had passed since she's been there? She's just a feel-good-about-me candidate for the Democrats.
Whew, I could post more, but I'm exhausted even thinking about all her "baggage" she'd tote back into the White House.
- The Gremlin Guy -
2007-08-14 15:10:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Thank you for bringing up the fact that she sat on the board of Wal-Mart. She was on the board for 6-7 years I believe and her time there ended upon Bill's entering the White House. 4 months later, Bill opened trade with China. Wal-Mart immediately forced US manufacturers to set up there or, close down in order to undercut pricing.
Thus, began the mass expansion, which threw many out of work, drove small businesses into bankruptcy, lowered the wages of those who resultantly had to turn to Wal-Mart to re-gain employment, robbed workers of their prior medical benefits and full time wages.
How many employment violations have been filed against that company? Most recently they were called to task for buying life insurance on their employees without their knowledge and pocketing the monies upon their deaths.
When looking at the history of all three (the Clintons, Wal-Mart and China), the Clintons have taken far too much campaign money from China and Wal-Mart for my comfort and still, make hefty profits off the stock they still hold in the company.
What part of this don't you understand?
Hillary and Bill are clearly not just socialist, but in fact, champions of communism and have sold our country out to their own benefit, not ours.
She is a one & a half time senator, which hardly qualifies as 'tons of experience.'
The health care reform that SHE instigated during Bill's term, ended up with her laying down to every demand the HMO's, insurance companies and attorneys wanted and instead, of returning us even one advantage, caused all our premiums to double or, even triple.
Those are the FACTS, what about them do you not understand?
This woman and her husband have a long list of shady business dealings and the pardons issued so hurriedly in the last few weeks of their stay in the White House (for money) show them again putting their own interest before those of the public. Career criminals should not be eligible for pardons for a cost.
Even Bill's recent association with InfoUSA is highly suspect and I am not sure that his pardoning of so many involved in mail fraud before leaving office is even a coincidence.
The list goes on and on....
No, this woman and her husband have already brought enough damage and shame upon our country while in the quest for their own brand of self-indulgent power. We don't need to further embellish them. Politicians are suppose to work on OUR behalf.
2007-08-14 15:25:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well she needs to stop losing weight. Sooner or later she'll be as thin as a life size cardboard.
2016-05-18 00:17:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is no Capitalist...she is personally greedy, yes, but that doesn't equate...Socialist leaders like to be on top of the "equal" heap...You equate living in the White House with experience? I think not--her only "initiative" in the Slickster years was a failed attempt to co-opt 17% of the economy with her secret health care scam. She's a Junior Senator with little to show on her resume and a very shady past...Yeah I would be worried, I think I would trust somebody from the Gambino Family more than I trust Hillary.
2007-08-14 15:00:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by makrothumeo2 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
She is just too polarizing. Can't we all agree on that? It would be like another 4 years of Bush it seems you either love him or hate him. Not a great way to unify the country in a time of war.
2007-08-14 14:51:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Serpico7 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Is she a capitalist pretending to be a socialist, or a socialist pretending to be a capitalist?
You're out of your mind if you think commuting Libby's sentence is an impeachable offense. Only "high crimes and misdemeanors" are impeachable, and commuting someone's sentence is neither. If it were, the commutation wouldn't even be valid, and no one has challenged that point, not even when they thought he would pardon them.
And while Hillary is not "linked" to "murder", there is Vince Foster. Was it murder? Not sure, could have been suicide, but it's beyond question that he did not die where his body was found. Was she linked? Not sure, but there aren't many people on the list of people with a reason to move the body.
2007-08-14 14:56:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by open4one 7
·
7⤊
6⤋
Hateful liar who will steal the money that you worked hard for and would like to use to support your family.
She will do anything to hurt hard-working Americans.
She is incompetent and has no experience at anything significant.
She will say any lie and sellout America for votes.
2007-08-14 15:29:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Duminos 2
·
0⤊
3⤋