2007-08-14 14:17:46 · 51 answers · asked by Mz. Massachusetts 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
With out a doubt Louisa... the amount of evidence against him would equal the height of mount everest if put side by side... the murderer was allowed to be free on a bumbling defense team and an idiotic jury.. along with an "out to lunch judge".. what a pot of chaos...
I feel for the victim's families.... they must surely be disillusioned with the legal system.. it let them down tremendously ....
2007-08-14 14:40:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As the killer left the scene, blood dripped from his left hand. They stop OJ in the airport and guess what? He has a deep cut on his left hand. Oh yeah, and the DNA of the blood matched his own.
Also going away from the murder scene was a unique set of footprints from rare super expensive Bruno Magli shoes -- size 11. OJ, who happens to wear size 11, says he would never own a pair of such "ugly assed" shoes. Lo and behold, photos are found showing him wearing those very type of shoes.
Lots of other clues left behind too, but these are the ones that always stick out in my mind. He's as guilty as sin.
2007-08-14 14:27:55 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he did. He murdered his ex wife and her friend (possibly boyfriend) and he got away with it. You might think that most of the time these are opinions because he was not proven guilty, but he wrote a book that is being published about "how he would have done it if he did" and is about what he did, just claiming that it is theoretical.
2007-08-14 14:27:57 · answer #3 · answered by fiftsoftball 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No doubt ... whatsoever.
When I was working my way through college I was a waitress at a busy diner in Laguna Beach. I waited on OJ's kids and Nicole's parents and sister often when they came in to dine. They requested me after awhile because I would always protect them and keep people away from them. I had many conversations with them and can tell you that in my heart ... even his children know he did it. Now they have no mother and they are stuck with a low life murderer for a father.
Nice how well the system works, huh?
So, so sad ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2007-08-14 14:26:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-08-14 14:23:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of all the former Heismen award winners who have committed double murder he was the most talented.
2007-08-14 14:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by mAD~mOD 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe he paid someone to murder for him and the Goldmans are going to hound him the rest of his life so no, he didn't get away with murder.
2007-08-14 14:25:23 · answer #7 · answered by Jess 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nobody gets away with murder. In the end all the dust will settle and comeuppance will be delivered.
2007-08-14 14:20:31 · answer #8 · answered by Adel 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. To get away with it he would have to have not have anyone know he did it. He got a life sentence he's just not in jail.
2007-08-14 14:25:54 · answer #9 · answered by Village Player 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say he did. Simply because there has been no further suspects or leads or investigations made by the LAPD.
2007-08-14 14:21:59 · answer #10 · answered by My Final Answer 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋