Is Scott Boras good or bad for the game of baseball?

Question

All answers accepted, make a good argument with pros and cons.

Answer 1

First let me say, I don't think all agents are bad for the game. There needs to be someone to look after the player's interests. I know people are going to attack that statement. Now lets get to Boras. He is is very bad for baseball. People say don't pay the salaries. Well then what about the prospects. Bad teams have to draft the top prosepcts in order to improve, right? Well teams can't draft the top prospects because Boras makes them nearly impossible to sign. So only the weathly teams can afford to draft them. Look at the prospect who was the 27th pick this year in the draft. The tigers gave him insane money, top pick money. That is going to force teams to pay more money to the higher picks.

Baseball needs a salary cap for its draft picks like the NBA. OF course someone would have to tie up and gag boras before that can happen.

Answer 2

Selig. Boras is merely making use of the unfastened agent gadget and the draft gadget to make funds - he's useful because of the fact the proprietors usually finally end up giving in to him for concern of finding undesirable. He'd be elementary to conquer if everybody had any cojones. Selig is a much bigger project. He has presided over the sport's slide from being "united statesa.'s pasttime" to an additionally-ran. He thinks a interest ruled by potential of a handful of markets is stable, yet can no longer know the reality that they are development no new followers in Pittsburgh, in Kansas city, in Baltimore, or any of incredibly some different cities that could no longer usually compete with the Yankees, pink Sox, or different communities that could spend 2, 3, or 4 circumstances as plenty. He thinks that merely because of the fact MLB is getting funds, they seem to be a healthful interest.

Answer 3

He's good for the game. He contributes to the salaries for baseball players going up. That makes baseball a more attractive sport for athletes, and that means the quality of play goes up.

As for the bonus demands for draft picks: some of the teams are being cheap and stupid. They're taking lower quality players to save a few hundred thousand dollars on a signing bonus. They can afford to sign these guys. Revenues for baseball have gone up way faster than signing bonuses for draft picks.

Answer 4

He's the worst. All the agents in sports are bad, and he's the biggest--ergo, the worst. **** sports agents. Goddamn parasites, all of them. Players should have to argue for their salaries themselves. Maybe some would go to college and actually learn something, instead of hanging out and waiting until draft day. Plus, they'd get to keep that cut they're paying to those leeches. . . .

Answer 5

He's just like any other agent. Their just doing their job. If the owners are stupid enough to pay for the player's salary demands, then it's their own fault. If the fans are willing to pay for annual ticket increases, to cover the salaries of the players, then it becomes their fault.

Answer 6

terriable... his players get long term deals which makes then too comfortable. They don't try hard in non-business seasons. He does a good job at hiding his horns...

Answer 7

He's the best there is at what he does.

Anyone who can piss off every owner in the game is definitely doing something right.

Answer 8

I think hes terrible, to me i think he turns the player against his team. Just for more money. I HATE THAT BASTARD!!. i hope a-rod fires him