Every thing created is not just some big explosion of a accident. Look around every thing thats made, God made and man made objects all have purpose. LIke a car is for transportation. God made trees for oxygen. Every single thing you look at has a purpose. The world was not a mastake of a big bang.
2007-08-14 12:29:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
You're clearly looking for concurrence, not an answer, but let me give you something to think about anyway.
A universe created only by physical laws and evolution would be defined by an inter-relationship between all things. Nothing without purpose could exist in such a universe, since they are all physically tied to one another through physical laws from the moment of the big bang. Only a divinely created universe could contain anything that has no apparent purpose.
The fact that "EVERYTHING has a purpose" is a property of a universe with physical origins, not divine creation.
Show me anything that does NOT have a purpose (aka inter-relationship with something else in the universe), and I'll admit divine intervention.
2007-08-14 13:22:17 · answer #1 · answered by freebird 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
nothing about the big bang was accidental nor a mistake. just because you can suppose a purpose behind everything you see doesn't mean that it was "created" with that in "mind". The universe is made out of particles that affect each other, they repel and attract each other. these forces seek a natural balance and complex chemistry arises.
everyone loves science. the technology around us is possible because of scientific knowledge of the natural world. everyone wants scientific advances, yet not many people like to admit what science tells us about ourselves and the world around us. if you want to deny scientific knowledge you will have to deny the existance of the computer in front of you.
But science isn't always right, so if you disagree or don't understand I advise you to read about the expirements and observations that have lead scientists to their conclusions. if those expirements and observations were good enough to convince soo many intelligent people, then maybe it will convince you.
2007-08-14 14:25:33 · answer #2 · answered by renegadephilosopher 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An ageless debate... I predict that this question will be asked thousands of times every day and all the answers will be about the same.. pro or con. The point is we really don't know and either accept the scientific answer (which changes about every decade) or we accept the creationist answer ( by faith) or blend the two together and find satisfaction there.
2007-08-14 12:45:12 · answer #3 · answered by Agnon L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you recognize what's much extra appealing and captivating? the actuality that it took billions of years of mutational perfection for something like someone to finally venture forth from the primordial ooze. Yeah, i think of you recognize what i'm conversing approximately. Evolution.
2016-10-02 08:16:37 · answer #4 · answered by earles 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. nature and science are perfect . why is it perfect? b/c there is no standard of perfection in the universe, science, or nature. i agree. it s the way to be. everything and everyone serve a purpose.
2007-08-14 12:34:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then what about god?
2007-08-16 01:09:54 · answer #6 · answered by M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true statement
2007-08-14 12:33:46 · answer #7 · answered by aihsertal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋