I like a show of hands as to who supports surrender and who supports winning the war..short reasons please.
2007-08-14 12:28:47 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bomb em back to the freakin stone ages, startin with the tora bora region where the infamous obl is said to be. Secure the perimeter of Iraq, let Iraqis deal with thair own, but contain them, until they make a stand one way or the other. If its the one way fine, if its the other, then bomb hell outta them too. This cut and run is a pile of horsehockey, but at the same time this year in & year out war is horsehockey too
2007-08-14 12:39:34 · answer #1 · answered by Job1000 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Cons, I would like to see a show of hand on who supports the lies in Iraq and who does not support them? Go figure,,,,,
Now onto your so called dbl question. First off your question is so vage its not even funny. Better yet I will leave it at that because the only thing you care about is your party. You could care less about this great country. If you did you would stand up to the lies in Iraq. Next you would tell G Bush to remove the army and put it back into Afgan!
Nuff said for the conse question or so called question.
2007-08-14 12:43:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If we leave, we can actually start fighting teror.
This current ar is spreading teror(Al qaida never opeated in iraq, now they do0, and is strenghtening terorists(al qaida is now back to pre 9/11 strength) So, this war is not doing anything to deter terroism, which is why we need our troops on the right battlefields, instead of policing a civil war we are not suppost to be a part of
Iraq was never a problem, now it is, it was never a hot spot for terrorists, now it is.
2007-08-14 15:01:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't support what we're do there now and I don't want to see us pull out losers.
I think if we are going to stay there it needs to be in a different capacity. Supply them with arms and technical assistance but stop fighting their war for them.
2007-08-14 12:38:05 · answer #4 · answered by From Yours Trully 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, can't answer without further clarification. Surrender to whom, since no one declared war on the U.S.? Winning which war, since the U.S. never officially declared one?
2007-08-14 12:38:07 · answer #5 · answered by socrates 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No one supports surrender, nor do we support neocon rants that try to falsely characterize Democrats.
2007-08-14 12:50:11 · answer #6 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We must NEVER surrender Iraq to the Iraqi People, never!
2007-08-14 12:36:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Democrats must not surrender because it is an act of cowardice. The US must be strong and must dictate the tempo when in right.
2007-08-14 12:38:15 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What do you mean surrender?
Can I turn around and ask who desires peace and who desires endless war?
2007-08-14 12:35:14 · answer #9 · answered by John T 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I have changed my mind and I now believe that we can't win this war..bring the troops home
2007-08-14 12:54:04 · answer #10 · answered by John 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋