... in spite of our constitution
with our civil rights being eroded away slowly but surely (read chenney, bush) how much more power can we afford to give the feds?
or do you like the idea of smaller govt and the States having more power to legislate law?
2007-08-14 10:49:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There are already enough laws to protect us; we don't need any new ones right now.
2007-08-14 10:59:41 · answer #1 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
States should have more power to regulate their own laws. I do however agree with many federal laws. The power should be in the states hands where it can cater to said individuals of that state.
Every state has specific needs/wants and should be applicable in that sense. I am also for a smaller government.
2007-08-14 10:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by Glen B 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
We are a Federalist nation meaning that the US Federal Government has the final say so.
A lot of lot are made without the consequences.
There are several kinds of Libetarians.
The Different Kinds of Libertarians. Reason cover Posted by Picasa (Note: The term “Libertarian” was originally used by anarchists/socialists such as Joseph ...
http://complicatedvisionary.blogspot.com/2007/01/different-kinds-of-libertarians.html
2007-08-14 10:59:56 · answer #3 · answered by Max R Waller 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No laws can protect you, The right to bear arms can if you bear them so you should,, No laws stopped (Bush and Cheney)The airplanes that flew into the WTC each law takes freedom away.
2007-08-14 11:20:51 · answer #4 · answered by ngcigar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
never in spite of the constitution - the constitution was set up to protect U.S. citizens from the government and yes I like the Idea of smaller govt
2007-08-14 11:00:06 · answer #5 · answered by rooster 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Laws without enforcement are useless. When congress passes a law, any law, the authors should be forced to say how the requirements of the new law will be funded.
2007-08-14 10:55:30 · answer #6 · answered by fredrick z 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Less federalism. It didn't begin with Bush,by the way. Increasing levels of federal power has been a constant with all presidents from Johnson on.
2007-08-14 11:01:17 · answer #7 · answered by Jurgen 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
we have so many laws that are intended to protect us but are not enforced by the monolithic superstructure of socialist government that we currently have, and still the socialists want even more laws and yet bigger government.
example: the socialists including bush who want MORE immigration laws, yet the ones we already have are STRICTER than the cumbersome loopholed laws they want to pass. They just refuse to ENFORCE the stricter laws of today.
2007-08-14 10:59:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its time to get back to state's rights.
2007-08-14 11:11:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO JUST ENFORCE THE ONES WE HAVE!
2007-08-14 12:29:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋