China
2007-08-14 10:31:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
In 2000, the total estimated personnel strength of the Chinese military was 2.5 million, of which 1.8 million were in service with the People's Liberation Army (ground forces). The ground forces were divided into 7 military regions with 27 military districts. Within the 7 military regions lie 21 Group Armies, each containing about 60,000 personnel. The Group Armies contain among them 44 infantry divisions, 13 infantry brigades, 10 armored divisions, 12 armored brigades, 5 artillery divisions, 20 artillery brigades, and 7 helicopter regiments. In addition, 5 infantry divisions, 2 infantry brigades, 1 armored brigade, 1 artillery division, 3 artillery brigades, and 3 anti-aircraft artillery (AAA) brigades are independent elements of the PLA not assigned to any specific Group Army. There are also three airborne divisions, which are manned by the People's Liberation Army Air Force.
2007-08-14 10:34:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rocco R 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would say China...several hundred thousand,if not a million.
I know that there are a lot of countries like North Korea, (and several other less oppressive countries) that make all men upon graduating high school or turning eighteen, join their military for at least two years. So even though they may not have as large an active military as the United States do, they have most of their young men trained if they are needed to defend their country.
2007-08-14 10:34:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lilliput1212 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
China. It is said that if necessary to raise a large Army, you can usually rely on 10% of the population. That would give the Chinese Army 200,000,000 people if needed(that's million now, 200million) Incredible huh?
2007-08-14 10:40:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Irish 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
maximum ecu armies are no the place even close to to the scale of the U. S. military... They deliver what they are in a position to. i'm a brit, and that i've got served interior the forces and notwithstanding i for my section have by no ability been to Iraq, a lot of my friends have... Britain sends greater troops to foreign places aspects in help of the U. S. than the different ecu u . s .... and not in basic terms to Iraq. one ingredient well worth pointing out although... the objective and objective of the U. S. and coalition forces in Iraq is to no longer administration the rustic... it somewhat is the interest of the Iraqi protection forces... the clarification the U. S. and her allies are in Iraq is to stabalise the rustic and help Iraq's own human beings so as that they are going to be waiting to regulate themselves... it is counter-efficient to think of of the U. S. forces as "there to regulate the rustic". that would assume that the U. S. have been making plans on last in Iraq for ever and easily struggling with for greater territory which isn't the case. maybe slightly pedantic, in spite of the undeniable fact that it is an important element to recollect.
2016-12-30 13:43:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Chinese with about 2 million soldiers, but the U.S. has the strongest army
2007-08-14 10:36:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bolivia
2007-08-14 10:29:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
China, with 2.8 million.
2007-08-14 10:36:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
China - By a long shot!
2007-08-14 10:29:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
China, but it takes two of them to make one American!~!
2007-08-14 10:37:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Hunter 4
·
0⤊
2⤋