Was Al Qaida trying to tell Clinton Something? Why did he not take TERROR seriously?

Question

-- The 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed 6 and injured 1,000
-- The 1993 Mogadishu firefight that killed 18 U.S. soldiers
-- The 1995 Saudi Arabia car bomb that killed 5 U.S. military personnel
-- The 1996 Khobal Towers bombing that killed 19 U.S. soldiers, wounding 515
-- The 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 231 citizens, 12 Americans and injured 5,000
-- The 2000 USS Cole attack in Yemen that killed 17 U.S. sailors, wounding 39

American People ~ "Um, Mr. Clinton.....Can you please get off the 19 year old intern and concentrate on this terror stuff. Please don't leave it for the next president to clean - up".

Who are bigger hypocrits? CONS or LIBS?

See my 360 Blog Poll!

Answer 1

He was too busy chasing skirts (and the interns in them).

Answer 2

The conspirators of the 1993 WTC are in prison.

Somalia was a poison pill left for Clinton by Dubya's father. Compare that with the Lebanon Marine Barracks bombings, please.

The Saudi, African and Yemini attacks occurred in foreign lands. All investigations were thwarted by Islamists in those countries.

And what will the next president have to clean up with Bush's folly in Iraq? This is the BIG question, not your rewriting of history to try to justify the pathetic and criminal neglect of the Bush Administration's mismanagement of our country.

Answer 3

The next U.S. president will face three key foreign policy challenges. First and foremost will be to set a course for victory in the terrorists' war on global order. The second will be to strengthen the international system that the terrorists seek to destroy. The third will be to extend the benefits of the international system in an ever-widening arc of security and stability across the globe. The most effective means for achieving these goals are building a stronger defense, developing a determined diplomacy, and expanding our economic and cultural influence. Using all three, the next president can build the foundations of a lasting, realistic peace.

Answer 4

BLAME THEM ALL--> CLINTON, BUSH, BUSH JR.

BIN LADEN WORK(ed)S FOR THE CIA!!! And if the CIA isn't protecting him now, Iran is or Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, So long as the conflict continues they, (old money) can keep the oil flowing. WWII's conflict with Japan began as an oil contest. Hiltler wanted land. Troy wanted Helen. War is fought for spoils and (they:profits) will not be denied, not matter who is president.

Learn some history. Roosevelt, Johnson, Clinton, Bush, Bush II, are all complicit in creating conflict to secure willing governments to comply with America's "energy or ideological demands."

Google FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS

Answer 5

You neglected many terrorist attacks, Oklahoma city for one, are you just spouting the rhetoric from the conservative party, trying to convince the American public that only chicken hawk republicans can protect us. I'll have to remind you that 911 was during the Bush administration.

Get out of the past, and join us in the present. Iraq, thousands of Americans dead, many many thousands of Iraq's dead including children.

Clinton is no longer President, Bush is and I am more scared now than ever before.

Answer 6

9/11 - George Bush sits reading Nursery Rhymes after being told America is under attack.

August 25-September 1 - George plays his guitar while New Orleans drowns.

London has been subject to car bombings, and England is our #1 supporter supposedly, in the war on "Terror"

Iraq has erupted into a civil war thanks to the heroism of Bush.

Saying you are tough on Terrorism and being tough on terrorism are two totally different things.

Answer 7

I would go look up how many times congress blocked Clinton from trying to take out terrorists during his terms.. but I'm too busy looking up crappy MSDS info right now for work.. sucks.


(P.S. I just had to stop for a second so my head wouldn't explode.. that's why I'm here :)

Answer 8

Give me a break Clinton constantly focused on terrorists if you remember it was your republican friends who said he was just trying to get attention away from Monica. So who are the real bad guys here? This question is a little dishonest don't you think.

I would say most people are hypocrites regardless of political affiliation.
I am now going to answer your poll.

Answer 9

He did take it seriously, he was just to busy to do anything, if someone had invented automatic ZIPPERS he would have had more time!~!

Answer 10

You see democrates consider the war on terror to be a bumper sticker