2007-08-14 08:30:21 · 13 answers · asked by killaJ 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
no, the san diego charger is going to win at least 13 games. There will be plenty of touchdowns to go around. Keep LT. He will carry the load in san diego. Jackson is also a great wr, with lots of potential. His size is great and he will quickly become philip rivers favorite target. Keep both of them
2007-08-14 08:38:48 · answer #1 · answered by SO_CAL 4 life 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't even think about trading away LT and Vincent Jackson for Bush and Colston. LT is in his own league and you would be getting robbed if you accepted this trade. LT is looking to do as good if not better than last year. He is worth way more than just Bush and Colston. Bush will be sharing his carries with Deuce McAllister and he won't get anywhere near the rushing yards or the rushing TD's as LT. I would reject the trade and see if he has a better RB to add to the trade and put him with Bush and Colston. You would be getting a better deal with getting Colston and giving away Jackson but you would be losing alot more than you would be getting overall. I would want a three for two deal if I were getting rid of LT. I would recommend trying to get both of his starting RB's because I bet that both of them combined don't even equal the fantasy points that LT has. So reject the trade and take his two starting RB's and the original WR's and that would be alot closer to an equal trade. If he don't accept, oh well, you still have LT! There's nothing wrong with that! Good luck with the trade!
2007-08-14 16:07:14 · answer #2 · answered by kptplayboy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Horrible idea, LT is the man, he's a runner, catcher, and a passer. Bush is still splitting time, and Colston is good but the points wouldn't even balance out. LT alone will average the same as both these players form the season, and you want to give them a wide receiver too? Bad trade... In most leagues you could get a quality running back and two good receivers for LT, even 2 runningbacks and a receiver. Your getting short changed here don't take it..
2007-08-14 15:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by Johnnykickass2007 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know you're thinking about it because you think the advantage colson gives you over Jackson is greater than the advantage LT gives you over Bush. While there's no way LT will do what he did last year again, Bush still splits time and isn't goalline. Don't underestimate Jackson, Either. I personally believe he has a shot for a serious break out season this year. Don't do it.
2007-08-14 15:46:15 · answer #4 · answered by Buy Sam a Drink 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, LT should not be traded. bush is good but he's no LT. plus, colston only had one good year so far.
2007-08-14 15:36:57 · answer #5 · answered by stanley l 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. LT is way to valuable
2007-08-18 01:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by jjjoesi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now way LT is better than ll of them. u gota be crazy to even think that. r u a rookie or somethin
2007-08-14 15:34:22 · answer #7 · answered by cbyzsportzfan 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unless you get Steven Jackson and Marvin H then HELL NO!!
2007-08-14 15:41:33 · answer #8 · answered by rob m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
if u need a wide receiver instead of jackson look up kevin curtis hes the number 1 wr in philly and is now mcnabbs big play man
2007-08-14 15:34:19 · answer #9 · answered by PsUnLiOns258 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
how have you done since you've been in this league? i'm just wondering because no person in their right mind would even contemplate this trade. actually, you can join my league and make that trade with me.
2007-08-14 17:15:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋