It's not all Bush (though I do not agree with most of his fiscal spending) check out some of that pork coming out of congress...we have collected record breaking taxes and still it isn't enough...time to strip down the government and put them ALL on a budget.
2007-08-14 08:34:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Erinyes 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nope, they didn't.
But then neither did the Blank Check Democratic Congress's from 1940 to 1994 care about who had to pay the bill for their deficit spending for 40 years straight.
As history shows, not one Democratic Party Congress in the history of the United States, has ever passed a balanced budget.
Not once ever !!!!!!
2007-08-14 08:43:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think Mr. Fred Thompson can explain to you how well our economy is doing. I quote
"The economic reality I’m talking about, and about which I’ve written on numerous occasions, is how well our country is doing economically thanks to the hard work of the American people, the innovation and competition our free market encourages, as well as the Bush tax cuts that helped spur 5½ years of economic growth.
Lower tax rates have increased economic growth to such a degree that we have been breaking tax-revenue records.
Since the spring of 2003, the economy has had average growth of over 3%, 8.2 million jobs have been created, and the inflation rate has stayed low. The current unemployment rate, 4.6%, is a full percentage point below what it averaged during the 1990s, and there have been 47 consecutive months (almost four years) of job growth. In the last three years, workers’ salaries have risen by $1.2 trillion, or $8,000 per worker, and consumer confidence recently reached its highest level in almost six years.
People have pointed out that journalists were trumpeting economic statistics during the Clinton administration that were not as good as those we have now, hence the 'greatest story never told.' "
2007-08-14 08:37:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Deficit Spending has been with us since George Washington.
He left a debt of $75,000.00.
It has increased ever since, except a few years, but always increased, up to the present time.
The debt increased under Clinton by $900,000,000.
Research it. I did.
NO, I do not approve of our Gov. and their waste, regardless of politics.
2007-08-14 08:37:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ed 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ha ha Blame Bush is the libs talking point I guess the short term memory libs forgot about Katrina (unless it is used to blame Bush)
2007-08-14 08:36:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
it particularly is improving? the area? coach me the area! i could desire to confirm this progression. All I see is greater debt for the little ones i've got not had yet. And their little ones, etc etc... much less stimulus, greater stimulants, please. I see rather plenty no progression, if any to this point. i'm a Republican, or a minimum of i presumed i became until they began leaning too far left on the instant, and now i've got have been given long long gone self keeping. i did not think of of Bush became too undesirable, and the alternative could even have been worse. i could in no way % the widely used jobs of the President on anybody, they are in basic terms too annoying. Even Obama is beginning as much as look like he's ageing speedy. as properly, as quickly as you will discover the staggering advancements interior the economic device that are an instant results of the Stimulus funds Obama has magically created out of nonexistent comfortable, then please enable me understand. in case you do not understand what I propose, the nationwide debt is larger than the quantity of money flowing by utilising the full usa and interior the possession of its voters at this element. subsequently, the money could desire to be revealed yet as a thank you to pay for all of it, and that drives inflation up, which makes each and each element greater severe priced interior the 1st place. i'm not disenchanted approximately any type of advancements everywhere even in spite of the shown fact that, I encompass them. i'm hoping this facilitates you, and that i'm hoping which you do come across the respond you're searching for, no submit to in concepts if it particularly is mine or somebody else's. thank you.
2016-12-15 15:07:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hard to say... Even if you get us in debt it might take 10 years for that to do the real damage.
2007-08-14 08:33:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by timssterling 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Come on Chi... Bush told as about that, right here from his own lips ;)
http://www.trilulilu.ro/mitipiti/d44ac5e4b05460
Alpha Male ;-)
2007-08-14 08:37:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Conan 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's working great. people are employed, people are getting richer, the economy is healthy.
It is only those who refuse to manage their credit that make things worse. maybe liberals are right, poor people may actually be too stupid to manage their own money.
2007-08-14 08:34:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well its not actuly his fault for the decficit spending. He thinks he is spending less than the country takes in, its just well... he really sucks at math
2007-08-14 08:32:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋