Need more real evidence to refute the global warming hoax?

Question

What's ironic is that this comes from The Washington Post, which I believe is a liberal publication. Recently John Livingston, of Washtington, D.C., was doing some research at the Library of Congress. While looking at page two of the November 2, 1922 edition of The Post, he discovered an article saying that scientists were reporting increasing water temperatures in the Arctic Ocean, which were causing icebergs to melt. This news, coupled with the revelation that 1934 was the hottest year on record, really blows a hole in Al Gore's attempt to promote global warming as science. The cry from the left several years ago that the planet was cooling (and it probably was, I don't know) just adds credence to the real scientists' claim that the earth's temperatures go through repeated cycles of cold and warmth and always have.

Answer 1

The Global Warming Fanatics have made a religion out of their paranoid belief that we are responsible for earths ever changing weather patterns.
There's allot of money at stake concerning the G.W scandal and those who are profiting from it are not about to admit that it's all a hoax in order to scare the masses into giving up as much money as possible for their cause.
But I hope someday Al Gore is found to be the crook that he truly is and pays heavily for it.
But in the meantime the new Global Warming Religion isn't going anywhere because people refuse to think for themselves or even look at the facts surrounding the sun and it's effects on our weather.

Answer 2

It is more of a law of averages, I think. This year, California's summer seems a little cold. We have had maybe two days where we have gotten 90-degree weather. Maybe about a thrid of those days, we get mid to upper seventies, and the rest of the time, it has been about the mid 80s. This is not last year's summer when temps were much hotter. We have a lot of wind coming off the water in the East Bay area, and it seems to blow constantly, giving us much cooler weather.

I do acknoledge that temps inland in some places are reporting hotter weather. So far, everything Al Gore predicted is happening as the polar opposite of what he said.

Is global warming really man-made?

Or is global warming really Al Gore-made?

Given the cool summer, I am inclined to go with the second statement. Global warming is baloney.

Answer 3

Global warming exists, and industrialzed man is accelerating the process, but is not the driving force behind it. Science (the God of the liberal) has proven that the earth goes through cyclical warming and cooling periods. The Middle Ages (post-bubonic plague) were the warmest period on Earth sicne the time of the dinosaurs, and civilization flourished accordingly. The glaciers melted, seas rose and there wasn't any major catastrophes. We are in a natural warming trend now, but we aren't helping matters any.

I think it is over hyped by a liberal leaning media. They are against large corporations, so they try to use global warming as a scare tactic to further their agenda. It would be physically impossible for all the glaciers to melt in thirty years; 90% of the fresh water on earth is in glaciers and ice caps.

The worst case scenario is that we will end up in an Ice Age; if the salinity of the oceans goes off, no warm water to heat the poles will come and everything will start to freeze again. More ice means more sunlight reflected back into space, which means more ice, etc.

Answer 4

you're asking the incorrect question. international warming and international cooling, as reliable as international purely perfect are all archives. The question is: Do human beings reason worldwide warming? the answer to it somewhat is NO. No evidence for this reason far has been got here across to exhibit a connection. there could be dissimilar propaganda and a great sort of money on the lower back of the hoax. do not fall for it. sense for your self. examine on the section and you will see with the aid of the lies.

Answer 5

Yes, you need real evidence. Saying that scientists noticed the Earth was warming in 1922 is not good evidence against global warming.

Answer 6

1) Any scientific study claiming to offer evidence in support of "global warming" is not true science because it doesn't follow the Scientific Method. There is no "control", no Earth without humans to study, even in the climate models.

2) If we cannot alter localized weather effects like a tornado, then what makes anyone think we can have an effect on *global* climate/weather effects?

3) Even if we presume that global warming is happening as the alarmists say it is, the question to ask is this: why do they think it is The End of The World? People will adapt like we always have.

Answer 7

Denying it ain't goin' to make it go away.
Satellites measured the temperature before and it was found that ground station temps are more accurate. The 0 .15 celsius difference doesn't have much relativity to the fact that global warming exists. There will always be naysayers- lobbyists, Exxon execs and politicians- who are going to dispute the facts.

Your article DOES NOT COME the Post but the Washington TImes.

Answer 8

i watched the national geographic channel also called NGC.

They have clearly explained watever u said in your question.

They showed the warm and cold cycles. How they generate and why this global warming affects this cycle.

That program was really nice. It gave me a lot of information and all that you need to knw.

Its true that the global warming is causing a improper warm and cold cycles.

This improper / Unstable situation results in excess melting of ice in one area/ country and in another place with more heat for many months ( climate change ) and in some place with more rain.

All these are just the result of the disturbance in the cycle which we are talking about.

The major cause of Global warming is CO2 produced from various companies around the globe, vehicular pollution.

Answer 9

I don't think you can take one year, ten years, or even a few centuries and say there is global warming.

The earth's temp is cyclic. and it has been getting warmer since the last ice age. Will it get much warmer before Mother Nature starts her compensation measures and starts cooling things down? Who knows.

Man will either adapt of perish. It's that simple.

Answer 10

What really blows up the global warming farce is the very evidence these "experts" cite. They only show an increasing average over the past 150 (or so) years, and blatantly ignore evidence to the contrary from thousands of years of data gathered from measuring CO2 levels in frozen ice core samples (higher CO2 means more heat, lower CO2 means less heat).

This world goes through warming and cooling cycles. We're currently in a warming cycle, and this isn't even the hottest cycle to date. Greenland is covered, for the most part, in permafrost - that being a permanent layer of ice over the ground, like a tundra. But, beneath that permafrost there are remains of farms and villages.

Now...how much hotter would it have to be for the tundra covering most of Greenland to not exist and for agriculture to be a viable method of survival in that region?