English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

Kobe is a loudmouth, but he certainly backs it up with his play. Bonds is a creep, but hey, most of the damage done has been to himself (if you can overlook his ex-wife and hundreds of players who have suffered unnecessarily at the hands of his cheating). If the allegations against Vick are true, then he exploited animals for his own personal gain, then brutally murdered them. Vick's actions are by far the most disturbing.

2007-08-14 08:01:21 · answer #1 · answered by baseball_is_my_life 6 · 2 2

Definitely not Kobe. He's just being a pampered star and whining a lot. I would put the ref involved with the mob and point fixes ahead of Kobe on the list. Bonds and Vick are both well hated now. I think Bonds is more of a villain in his sport because of the fact that he's broken a cherished record. His alleged wrongdoings are related to the sport. It also sheds light on how clean baseball isn't as a whole. The Vick situation is bad for football, but not in the same manner as Bonds. The allegations against Vick aren't compromising the validity of the entire league, it's records, and possibly recent champions. He's mainly just screwed himself over. Sure the Falcons are hurting, but the NFL will move on and still be great. Unlike baseball where the legitamacy of the entire league is in question. So I think Bonds wins for being more of a villain to his sport. Though the Vick case has many people disgusted with him, football fans as well as animal fans.

2016-05-17 21:48:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Michael Vick

2007-08-14 08:50:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

Hey, let's not forget Vick has not been convicted of anything and the NFL has already suspended him for the year. Innocent until proven guilty right?

Ok, so there is all this public evidence against him, but so what, he hasn't been convicted.

(that fictional tirade was done to the benefit of those people that believe because Bonds has never tested positive, he has never done steroids)

Let's see, assumptions aside
Vick was involved in dog fighting, Bryant in rape and Bonds in steroids.

If all were guilty, the order of worse to less worse would EASILY be Bryant, Vick and then Bonds.

Bonds cheated, sure, but it's certainly not a comparison to the rape of a woman.

I didn't follow the Bryant dealings, but I know you can get out of a lot of things with money, so while I don't know if rape actually took place, he certainly cheated on his wife. Something that he and Bonds (and Arod) have in common.

Offence against people, offence against animals, an offence against a game. No matter how great we feel the game is, life comes first.

2007-08-14 08:17:18 · answer #4 · answered by brettj666 7 · 2 1

Michael Vick, definitely. As much as I hate to say it , with or without steroids, breaking that record was an accomplishment, and it was going to happen some time anyway. There is no excuse for what Bryant did, but to fight innocent animals for money, and then slaughter the loosing dog using inhumane methods is not acceptable. I'm not saying what Bryant did was O.K., but it wasn't as bad (now, if he killed the women, it would have been different), but the victim not testifying says something. But still, being a Dog lover, I think Vick gets my vote for biggest villan.

2007-08-14 09:17:14 · answer #5 · answered by blindman6592 2 · 1 0

Right now, it has to be Vick. He is serious trouble with the dogfighting, and it does not look good considering the other three are making plea bargains and may give info that hurts Vick. He had the big contract and all the talent, why dogfighting? on your own property?
If Bonds is actually caught or proved to have been using steroids, he will turn out to be a bigger villain than Pete Rose and everybody. The thing is, he would have been a hall of famer without steroids.
Kobe is selfish and just needs to grow up, and stay away from women.

2007-08-14 08:09:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Kobe Bryant.

What Vick "supposedly" did, (I am trying to be PC), was really bad. But what Kobe "may have done" is a lot worse. And what Bonds "supposedly" did only affects his body, so I don't care.

Human, Dog, Game. That's the order. Raping a human being is worse than killing a Pit Bull, which is worse than cheating a game.

2007-08-14 08:44:05 · answer #7 · answered by Veritas et Aequitas () 7 · 1 1

This seems like a no brainer to me. Bryant cheated on his wife by raping some girl (was she underage? I forget). That's worse than Vick's torturing of dogs in my book.

And BOTH are MUCH worse than Barry Bonds' steroid use.

2007-08-14 09:22:08 · answer #8 · answered by Edik 5 · 0 2

Kobe bought his way out of Jail but I don't think that Vick will be able to. Its grizzly what he was doing to those poor dogs. Bonds hasn't done anything int their league so I would have to go with Vick as the biggest villian.

2007-08-14 07:57:11 · answer #9 · answered by Oz 7 · 1 2

At this moment Bonds is just as bad as Vick considering neither has been PROVEN guilty and in our country you are INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. However, Bonds is the only one accused of cheating at the sport itself. SO the answer to your question would be Bonds; but Vick has casted the biggest shadow in the country at this point.

2007-08-14 07:56:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers